» Articles » PMID: 35936935

In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage with Two Different Techniques of Placing Stainless Steel Crowns on Mandibular Deciduous First Molar Teeth with Decreased Mesiodistal Width

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35936935
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) of the opposing maxillary deciduous molar teeth are used in mandibular deciduous first molars with decreased proximal surfaces due to caries. However, the SSCs of maxillary deciduous molar teeth are different from those of the mandibular deciduous molars in terms of the occlusal surface morphology, the buccal margin, and the proximal surface contour. Therefore, it is possible to prepare the buccal and lingual surfaces to use the SSC of the lower deciduous molar teeth and compare microleakage. Eighty extracted mandibular deciduous first molars were randomly assigned to two groups. In the case group (BLP), the buccal (B) and lingual (L) surfaces were prepared in addition to the proximal (P) surface, and an SSC was placed on the mandibular first deciduous teeth. Only the proximal surface was prepared in the control (P) group, and the SSC of the opposing tooth (maxillary deciduous first molar teeth) was placed. After dissecting the teeth, the extent of dye penetration was measured. The difference in microleakage on the buccal aspect between the case and control groups was significant (=0.02); however, the difference in microleakage on the lingual aspect between the case and control groups was not significant (=0.89). Microleakage at the buccal margin of the SSC of mandibular deciduous first molars was less than the maxillary deciduous first molar SSC, with no significant differences in the lingual margin.

Citing Articles

Microleakage of luting cements in CAD/CAM pediatric zirconia crowns: an in vitro study.

Iampinitkul S, Chaijareenont P, Chinadet W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29295.

PMID: 39592840 PMC: 11599277. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81088-5.

References
1.
Reddy M, Subba Reddy V, Basappa N . A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011; 28(4):245-50. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.76150. View

2.
Memarpour M, Mesbahi M, Rezvani G, Rahimi M . Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2012; 33(7):501-4. View

3.
Sohrabi M, Ghadimi S, Seraj B . Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements. Front Dent. 2019; 16(1):31-36. PMC: 6778613. DOI: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1106. View

4.
Subramaniam P, Kondae S, Gupta K . Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010; 34(4):309-12. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.34.4.p5h1068v41ggt450. View

5.
Yilmaz Y, Dalmis A, Gurbuz T, Simsek S . Retentive force and microleakage of stainless steel crowns cemented with three different luting agents. Dent Mater J. 2005; 23(4):577-84. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.23.577. View