» Articles » PMID: 35935909

Repeated Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia: Outcome and Predictive Factors

Overview
Journal Arab J Urol
Date 2022 Aug 8
PMID 35935909
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as little is known about the extraction rate in repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in these patients.

Patients And Methods: A total of 134 men with NOA had their first sperm recovery between January 2013 and February 2020. Repeated microTESE had been done mostly for patients with a successful initial retrieval.

Results: In the 323 procedures performed on the 134 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 236 procedures (73.1%). A total of 88, 61 and 40 men underwent two, three and four sperm retrievals, respectively. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in 65 (73.9%), 53 (86.9%) and 37 (92.5%) men, respectively. During the first microTESE procedure, sperm could be extracted in 81 (60.4%) men with NOA. In all, the success rate was significantly different between subgroups, showing highest rate in hypospermatogenesis cases (95.6%), followed by maturation arrest (58.5%), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (56.0%). However, this difference was not significant at the third and fourth repeated microTESE. The FSH levels and testicular volume were among the noticeable factors affecting success of sperm retrieval. The duration between the first and second biopsies significantly increased the success rate by a factor of 1.3-fold/month; however, afterwards, the duration did not play any role in the success of microTESE. The success of previous trial significantly increased the probability of success by 10.1-fold in the second trial, 5.6-fold in the third trial, and 16.5 folds in the fourth.

Conclusion: Repeated MD -TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate in patients with NOA. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat microTESE procedure can be planned.

Abbreviations: ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MA: maturation arrest; (N)OA: (non-)obstructive azoospermia; OR: odds ratio; SCOS, Sertoli cell-only syndrome; SRR: spermatozoa retrieval rate; (micro)TESE: (microdissection) testicular sperm extraction.

Citing Articles

AI predictive models and advancements in microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic scoping review.

Jamalirad H, Jajroudi M, Khajehpour B, Sadighi Gilani M, Eslami S, Sabbaghian M Hum Reprod Open. 2025; 2025(1):hoae070.

PMID: 39764557 PMC: 11700607. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae070.


Role of Follicle-stimulating Hormone, Inhibin B, and Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Predicting Sperm Retrieval from Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pozzi E, Corsini C, Belladelli F, Bertini A, Negri F, Raffo M Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 65:3-12.

PMID: 38854995 PMC: 11153941. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.001.


Global Practice Patterns and Variations in the Medical and Surgical Management of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey, Guidelines and Expert Recommendations.

Rambhatla A, Shah R, Ziouziou I, Kothari P, Salvio G, Gul M World J Mens Health. 2024; 43(1):92-122.

PMID: 38606867 PMC: 11704169. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230339.

References
1.
Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P . Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13(6):539-49. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm029. View

2.
Bryson C, Ramasamy R, Sheehan M, Palermo G, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel P . Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. J Urol. 2013; 191(1):175-8. PMC: 4077600. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.065. View

3.
Schlegel P . Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(1):131-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.1.131. View

4.
Schlegel P, Su L . Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12(8):1688-92. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1688. View

5.
Vernaeve V, Tournaye H, Osmanagaoglu K, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P . Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa is less successful in men with nonobstructive azoospermia than in men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79(3):529-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04809-4. View