» Articles » PMID: 12620435

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Testicular Spermatozoa is Less Successful in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia Than in Men with Obstructive Azoospermia

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2003 Mar 7
PMID 12620435
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficiency of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using testicular spermatozoa in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary university-based infertility center.

Patient(s): Overall, 595 couples were included. In 360 couples, the man had normal spermatogenesis. In 118, 85, and 32 couples the man had germ-cell aplasia, maturation arrest, and tubular sclerosis/atrophy, all with focal spermatogenesis present.

Intervention(s): We performed 911 ICSI cycles using fresh sperm obtained after testicular biopsies: 306 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and 605 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization, cleavage, implantation, and pregnancy rates.

Result(s): Overall, the 2PN fertilization rate was lower in the nonobstructive group: 48.5% vs. 59.7%. There were no differences in in vitro development or in the morphological quality of the embryos. In the nonobstructive group, a total of 718 embryos were transferred (262 transfers) vs. 1,525 embryos in the obstructive group (544 transfers). Both the clinical implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle were significantly lower in the nonobstructive group compared with the obstructive group: 8.6% vs. 12.5% and 15.4% vs. 24.0%, respectively.

Conclusion(s): A statistically significant lower rate of fertilization and pregnancy results from ICSI with testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, compared with men with obstructive azoospermia.

Citing Articles

IVF outcomes following ICSI cycles using testicular sperm in obstructive (OA) vs. non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and the impact of maternal and paternal age: a SART CORS data registry.

Sadek S, Matitashvili T, Sharaf Alddin R, Morshedi B, Ramadan H, Dodani S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023; 40(3):627-637.

PMID: 36662354 PMC: 10033785. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02726-x.


Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors.

Ghalayini I, Alazab R, Halalsheh O, Al-Mohtaseb A, Al-Ghazo M Arab J Urol. 2022; 20(3):137-143.

PMID: 35935909 PMC: 9354641. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2028066.


Successful approach for couples having their own genetic offspring using vitrified-warmed oocytes injected by frozen-thawed poor quality testicular sperm: A case report.

Safari S, Amouzegar H, Ashourzadeh S, Hosseini E Clin Case Rep. 2022; 10(3):e05627.

PMID: 35340650 PMC: 8935125. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5627.


Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in azoospermic men who underwent testicular sperm extraction vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A cross-sectional study.

Vahidi S, Narimani N, Abouei S, Sadeghi A, Lorian K, Rahavian A Int J Reprod Biomed. 2021; 19(9):837-844.

PMID: 34723063 PMC: 8548752. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i9.9716.


Sperm Selection Procedures for Optimizing the Outcome of ICSI in Patients with NOA.

Aydos K, Aydos O J Clin Med. 2021; 10(12).

PMID: 34207121 PMC: 8234729. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122687.