» Articles » PMID: 35932111

Assessment of Neurological Impairment and Recovery Using Statistical Models of Neurologically Healthy Behavior

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While many areas of medicine have benefited from the development of objective assessment tools and biomarkers, there have been comparatively few improvements in techniques used to assess brain function and dysfunction. Brain functions such as perception, cognition, and motor control are commonly measured using criteria-based, ordinal scales which can be coarse, have floor/ceiling effects, and often lack the precision to detect change. There is growing recognition that kinematic and kinetic-based measures are needed to quantify impairments following neurological injury such as stroke, in particular for clinical research and clinical trials. This paper will first consider the challenges with using criteria-based ordinal scales to quantify impairment and recovery. We then describe how kinematic-based measures can overcome many of these challenges and highlight a statistical approach to quantify kinematic measures of behavior based on performance of neurologically healthy individuals. We illustrate this approach with a visually-guided reaching task to highlight measures of impairment for individuals following stroke. Finally, there has been considerable controversy about the calculation of motor recovery following stroke. Here, we highlight how our statistical-based approach can provide an effective estimate of impairment and recovery.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Link Between Motor Functions and the Relative Use of the More Affected Arm in Adults with Cerebral Palsy.

Poitras I, Clouatre J, Campeau-Lecours A, Mercier C Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943298 PMC: 11819957. DOI: 10.3390/s25030660.


Resting state functional connectivity associated with impaired proprioception post-stroke.

Kenzie J, Rajashekar D, Goodyear B, Dukelow S Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 45(1):e26541.

PMID: 38053448 PMC: 10789217. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26541.


A robot-based interception task to quantify upper limb impairments in proprioceptive and visual feedback after stroke.

Park K, Ritsma B, Dukelow S, Scott S J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):137.

PMID: 37821970 PMC: 10568927. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01262-0.


Alterations in the preferred direction of individual arm muscle activation after stroke.

Hong Y, Roh J Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1280276.

PMID: 37808491 PMC: 10556656. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1280276.


Clinical, Neuroimaging and Robotic Measures Predict Long-Term Proprioceptive Impairments following Stroke.

Chilvers M, Rajashekar D, Low T, Scott S, Dukelow S Brain Sci. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37371431 PMC: 10296129. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13060953.


References
1.
Stinear C, Byblow W, Ackerley S, Smith M, Borges V, Barber P . Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design. Stroke. 2017; 48(3):795-798. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020. View

2.
Dukelow S, Herter T, Moore K, Demers M, Glasgow J, Bagg S . Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 24(2):178-87. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309345267. View

3.
Wood M, Simmatis L, Boyd J, Scott S, Jacobson J . Using principal component analysis to reduce complex datasets produced by robotic technology in healthy participants. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):71. PMC: 6069537. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0416-5. View

4.
Smith M, Byblow W, Barber P, Stinear C . Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke. Stroke. 2017; 48(5):1400-1403. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016478. View

5.
Mutha P, Haaland K, Sainburg R . The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation. J Mot Behav. 2012; 44(6):455-69. PMC: 3549328. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.747482. View