Directional and General Impairments in Initiating Motor Responses After Stroke

Overview

Journal Brain Commun

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Apr 14

PMID 37056474

Authors

Kayne Park

Matthew J Chilvers

Trevor A Low

Sean P Dukelow

Stephen H Scott

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Visuospatial neglect is a disorder characterized by an impairment of attention, most commonly to the left side of space in individuals with stroke or injury to the right hemisphere. Clinical diagnosis is largely based on performance on pen and paper examinations that are unable to accurately measure the speed of processing environmental stimuli-important for interacting in our dynamic world. Numerous studies of impairment after visuospatial neglect demonstrate delayed reaction times when reaching to the left. However, little is known of the visuospatial impairment in other spatial directions and, further, the influence of the arm being assessed. In this study, we quantify the ability of a large cohort of 204 healthy control participants (females = 102) and 265 individuals with stroke (right hemisphere damage = 162, left hemisphere damage = 103; mean age 62) to generate goal-directed reaches. Participants used both their contralesional and ipsilesional arms to perform a centre-out visually guided reaching task in the horizontal plane. We found that the range of visuospatial impairment can vary dramatically across individuals with some individuals displaying reaction time impairments restricted to a relatively small portion of the workspace, whereas others displayed reaction time impairments in all spatial directions. Reaction time impairments were observed in individuals with right or left hemisphere lesions (48% and 30%, respectively). Directional impairments commonly rotated clockwise when reaching with the left versus the right arms. Impairment in all spatial directions was more prevalent in right than left hemisphere lesions (32% and 12%, respectively). Behavioral Inattention Test scores significantly correlated ( = -0.49, < 0.005) with reaction time impairments but a large portion of individuals not identified as having visuospatial neglect on the Behavioral Inattention Test still displayed reaction time impairments (35%). MRI and CT scans identified distinct white matter and cortical regions of damage for individuals with directional (insula, inferior frontal-occipital fasciculus and inferior longitudinal fasciculus) and general (superior and middle temporal gyri) visuospatial impairment. This study highlights the prevalence and diversity of visuospatial impairments that can occur following stroke.

Citing Articles

Environmental therapy: interface design strategies for color graphics to assist navigational tasks in patients with visuospatial disorders through an analytic hierarchy process based on CIE color perception.

Li W, Ma S, Liu Y, Lin H, Lv H, Shi W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1348023.

PMID: 39529723 PMC: 11551028. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348023.

Transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: clinical insights for personalized rehabilitation.

Lin D, Backus D, Chakraborty S, Liew S, Valero-Cuevas F, Patten C J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):18.

PMID: 38311729 PMC: 10840185. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01309-w.

References

Medina J, Kannan V, Pawlak M, Kleinman J, Newhart M, Davis C . Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 21(11):2073-84. PMC: 2828044. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21160. View

Karnath H, Ferber S, Himmelbach M . Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature. 2001; 411(6840):950-3. DOI: 10.1038/35082075. View

Dragone A, Lasaponara S, Silvetti M, Macaluso E, Doricchi F . Selective reorienting response of the left hemisphere to invalid visual targets in the right side of space: relevance for the spatial neglect syndrome. Cortex. 2015; 65:31-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.009. View

Berthier M, Starkstein S, Leiguarda R . Behavioral effects of damage to the right insula and surrounding regions. Cortex. 1987; 23(4):673-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80057-6. View

Molenberghs P, Sale M, Mattingley J . Is there a critical lesion site for unilateral spatial neglect? A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:78. PMC: 3322487. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00078. View

Vaessen M, Saj A, Lovblad K, Gschwind M, Vuilleumier P . Structural white-matter connections mediating distinct behavioral components of spatial neglect in right brain-damaged patients. Cortex. 2016; 77:54-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.12.008. View

Chen Y, Byrne P, Crawford J . Time course of allocentric decay, egocentric decay, and allocentric-to-egocentric conversion in memory-guided reach. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 49(1):49-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.031. View

Vuilleumier P, Schwartz S, Verdon V, Maravita A, Hutton C, Husain M . Abnormal attentional modulation of retinotopic cortex in parietal patients with spatial neglect. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(19):1525-9. PMC: 2863074. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.072. View

Godefroy O, Spagnolo S, Roussel M, Boucart M . Stroke and action slowing: mechanisms, determinants and prognosis value. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 29(5):508-14. DOI: 10.1159/000297968. View

10.

Xu Y, Terekhov A, Latash M, Zatsiorsky V . Forces and moments generated by the human arm: variability and control. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 223(2):159-75. PMC: 3501382. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3235-0. View

11.

Rossit S, Malhotra P, Muir K, Reeves I, Duncan G, Livingstone K . No neglect-specific deficits in reaching tasks. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19(11):2616-24. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp016. View

12.

Skurvidas A, Mickevichiene D, Cesnavichiene V, Gutnik B, Nash D . Reaction time and movement duration influence on end point accuracy in a fast reaching task. Fiziol Cheloveka. 2012; 38(3):73-80. View

13.

Farrer C, Frith C . Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(3):596-603. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1009. View

14.

Shimodozono M, Matsumoto S, Miyata R, Etoh S, Tsujio S, Kawahira K . Perceptual, premotor and motor factors in the performance of a delayed-reaching task by subjects with unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(10):1752-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.012. View

15.

Robertson I . Do we need the "lateral" in unilateral neglect? Spatially nonselective attention deficits in unilateral neglect and their implications for rehabilitation. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(1 Pt 2):S85-90. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0838. View

16.

Scott S . Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J Neurosci Methods. 1999; 89(2):119-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00053-9. View

17.

Nelles G, Widman G, de Greiff A, Meistrowitz A, Dimitrova A, Weber J . Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke. 2002; 33(5):1286-93. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000013685.76973.67. View

18.

Halligan P, Marshall J . Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989; 11(6):793-8. DOI: 10.1080/01688638908400936. View

19.

Pinto M, Pellegrino M, Lasaponara S, Scozia G, DOnofrio M, Raffa G . Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2021; 154:107773. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107773. View

20.

Buneo C, Jarvis M, Batista A, Andersen R . Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature. 2002; 416(6881):632-6. DOI: 10.1038/416632a. View