» Articles » PMID: 35930206

Modeling Receptor Flexibility in the Structure-based Design of KRAS Inhibitors

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

KRAS has long been referred to as an 'undruggable' target due to its high affinity for its cognate ligands (GDP and GTP) and its lack of readily exploited allosteric binding pockets. Recent progress in the development of covalent inhibitors of KRAS has revealed that occupancy of an allosteric binding site located between the α3-helix and switch-II loop of KRAS-sometimes referred to as the 'switch-II pocket'-holds great potential in the design of direct inhibitors of KRAS. In studying diverse switch-II pocket binders during the development of sotorasib (AMG 510), the first FDA-approved inhibitor of KRAS, we found the dramatic conformational flexibility of the switch-II pocket posing significant challenges toward the structure-based design of inhibitors. Here, we present our computational approaches for dealing with receptor flexibility in the prediction of ligand binding pose and binding affinity. For binding pose prediction, we modified the covalent docking program CovDock to allow for protein conformational mobility. This new docking approach, termed as FlexCovDock, improves success rates from 55 to 89% for binding pose prediction on a dataset of 10 cross-docking cases and has been prospectively validated across diverse ligand chemotypes. For binding affinity prediction, we found standard free energy perturbation (FEP) methods could not adequately handle the significant conformational change of the switch-II loop. We developed a new computational strategy to accelerate conformational transitions through the use of targeted protein mutations. Using this methodology, the mean unsigned error (MUE) of binding affinity prediction were reduced from 1.44 to 0.89 kcal/mol on a set of 14 compounds. These approaches were of significant use in facilitating the structure-based design of KRAS inhibitors and are anticipated to be of further use in the design of covalent (and noncovalent) inhibitors of other conformationally labile protein targets.

Citing Articles

Molecular glue degrader for tumor treatment.

Hu Y, Yan Y, Wang J, Hou J, Lin Q Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1512666.

PMID: 39759140 PMC: 11697593. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1512666.


Impact of protein conformations on binding free energy calculations in the beta-secretase 1 system.

Baumann H, Mobley D J Comput Chem. 2024; 45(23):2024-2033.

PMID: 38725239 PMC: 11236511. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.27365.


Cryo-EM structure determination of small therapeutic protein targets at 3 Å-resolution using a rigid imaging scaffold.

Castells-Graells R, Meador K, Arbing M, Sawaya M, Gee M, Cascio D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(37):e2305494120.

PMID: 37669364 PMC: 10500258. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2305494120.


In Silico Evaluation of the Thr58-Associated Conserved Water with KRAS Switch-II Pocket Binders.

Leini R, Pantsar T J Chem Inf Model. 2023; 63(5):1490-1505.

PMID: 36854010 PMC: 10015465. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01479.


Inhibition mechanism of MRTX1133 on KRAS: a molecular dynamics simulation and Markov state model study.

Liang F, Kang Z, Sun X, Chen J, Duan X, He H J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2023; 37(3):157-166.

PMID: 36849761 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-023-00498-1.


References
1.
Fell J, Fischer J, Baer B, Blake J, Bouhana K, Briere D . Identification of the Clinical Development Candidate , a Covalent KRAS Inhibitor for the Treatment of Cancer. J Med Chem. 2020; 63(13):6679-6693. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02052. View

2.
Antunes D, Devaurs D, Kavraki L . Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015; 10(12):1301-13. DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1094458. View

3.
Janes M, Zhang J, Li L, Hansen R, Peters U, Guo X . Targeting KRAS Mutant Cancers with a Covalent G12C-Specific Inhibitor. Cell. 2018; 172(3):578-589.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006. View

4.
Schindler C, Baumann H, Blum A, Bose D, Buchstaller H, Burgdorf L . Large-Scale Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations in Active Drug Discovery Projects. J Chem Inf Model. 2020; 60(11):5457-5474. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00900. View

5.
Zhu K, Pincus D, Zhao S, Friesner R . Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program. Proteins. 2006; 65(2):438-52. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21040. View