» Articles » PMID: 35928948

Force-Bioreactor for Assessing Pharmacological Therapies for Mechanobiological Targets

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 5
PMID 35928948
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue fibrosis is a major health issue that impacts millions of people and is costly to treat. However, few effective anti-fibrotic treatments are available. Due to their central role in fibrotic tissue deposition, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts are the target of many therapeutic strategies centered primarily on either inducing apoptosis or blocking mechanical or biochemical stimulation that leads to excessive collagen production. Part of the development of these drugs for clinical use involves prescreening. 2D screens, however, are not ideal for discovering mechanobiologically significant compounds that impact functions like force generation and other cell activities related to tissue remodeling that are highly dependent on the conditions of the microenvironment. Thus, higher fidelity models are needed to better simulate conditions and relate drug activity to quantifiable functional outcomes. To provide guidance on effective drug dosing strategies for mechanoresponsive drugs, we describe a custom force-bioreactor that uses a fibroblast-seeded fibrin gels as a relatively simple mimic of the provisional matrix of a healing wound. As cells generate traction forces, the volume of the gel reduces, and a calibrated and embedded Nitinol wire deflects in proportion to the generated forces over the course of 6 days while overhead images of the gel are acquired hourly. This system is a useful tool for quantifying myofibroblast dose-dependent responses to candidate biomolecules, such as blebbistatin. Administration of 50 μM blebbistatin reliably reduced fibroblast force generation approximately 40% and lasted at least 40 h, which in turn resulted in qualitatively less collagen production as determined via fluorescent labeling of collagen.

Citing Articles

Capsule release surgery temporarily reduces contracture in a rat elbow model of arthrofibrosis.

Scholp A, Jensen J, Fowler T, Petersen E, Fredericks D, Salem A J Orthop Res. 2024; 43(1):23-36.

PMID: 39279043 PMC: 11615420. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25967.

References
1.
Bates J, Smith B . Ventilator-induced lung injury and lung mechanics. Ann Transl Med. 2018; 6(19):378. PMC: 6212358. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.29. View

2.
Qu F, Guilak F, Mauck R . Cell migration: implications for repair and regeneration in joint disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019; 15(3):167-179. PMC: 7004411. DOI: 10.1038/s41584-018-0151-0. View

3.
Kollmannsberger P, Bidan C, Dunlop J, Fratzl P, Vogel V . Tensile forces drive a reversible fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition during tissue growth in engineered clefts. Sci Adv. 2018; 4(1):eaao4881. PMC: 5771696. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao4881. View

4.
Asmani M, Kotei C, Hsia I, Marecki L, Wang T, Zhou C . Cyclic Stretching of Fibrotic Microtissue Array for Evaluation of Anti-Fibrosis Drugs. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2019; 12(5):529-540. PMC: 6816662. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-019-00590-3. View

5.
El-Hattab M, Nagumo Y, Gourronc F, Klingelhutz A, Ankrum J, Sander E . Human Adipocyte Conditioned Medium Promotes In Vitro Fibroblast Conversion to Myofibroblasts. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):10286. PMC: 7314785. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67175-3. View