» Articles » PMID: 35925432

Information Theoretic Evaluation of Lorentzian, Gaussian, Voigt, and Symmetric Alpha-stable Models of Reversible Transverse Relaxation in Cervical Cancer in Vivo at 3 T

Overview
Journal MAGMA
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Aug 4
PMID 35925432
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objects: To better characterize cervical cancer at 3 T. MRI transverse relaxation patterns hold valuable biophysical information about cellular scale microstructure. Lorentzian modeling is typically used to represent intravoxel frequency distributions, resulting in mono-exponential decay of reversible transverse relaxation. However, deviations from mono-exponential decay are expected theoretically and observed experimentally.

Materials And Methods: We compared the information content of four models of signal attenuation with reversible transverse relaxation. Biological phantoms and six women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma were imaged using a gradient-echo sampling of the spin-echo (GESSE) sequence. Lorentzian, Gaussian, Voigt, and Symmetric α-Stable (SAS) models were ranked using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), and the model retaining the highest information content was identified at each voxel as the best model.

Results: The Lorentzian model resulted in information loss in large fractions of the phantoms and cervix. Gaussian and SAS models frequently had higher information content than the Lorentzian in much of the areas of interest. The Voigt model rarely surpassed the three other models in terms of information content.

Discussion: Gaussian and SAS models provide better fitting of data in much of the human cervix at 3 T. Minimizing information loss through improved tissue modeling may have important implications for identifying reliable biomarkers of tumor hypoxia and iron deposition.

Citing Articles

Bridging Experimentation and Computation: OMSP for Advanced Acrylate Characterization and Digital Photoresin Design in Vat Photopolymerization.

Okoruwa L, Tarak F, Sameni F, Sabet E Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39861276 PMC: 11769313. DOI: 10.3390/polym17020203.

References
1.
Schenck J . The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys. 1996; 23(6):815-50. DOI: 10.1118/1.597854. View

2.
Hopkins J, Wehrli F . Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn Reson Med. 1997; 37(4):494-500. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910370404. View

3.
Yablonskiy D . Quantitation of intrinsic magnetic susceptibility-related effects in a tissue matrix. Phantom study. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 39(3):417-28. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390312. View

4.
Yablonskiy D, Haacke E . Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med. 1994; 32(6):749-63. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910320610. View

5.
Kiselev V, Novikov D . Transverse NMR relaxation in biological tissues. Neuroimage. 2018; 182:149-168. PMC: 6175675. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.002. View