» Articles » PMID: 35923830

Incongruity of Geometric and Spectral Markers in the Assessment of Body Sway

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Aug 4
PMID 35923830
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different measurements of body oscillations in the time or frequency domain are being employed as markers of gait and balance abnormalities. This study investigates basic relationships within and between geometric and spectral measures in a population of young adult subjects. Twenty healthy subjects stood with parallel feet on a force platform with and without a foam pad. Adaptation effects to prolonged stance were assessed by comparing the first and last of a series of eight successive trials. Centre of Foot Pressure (CoP) excursions were recorded with Eyes Closed (EC) and Open (EO) for 90s. Geometric measures (Sway Area, Path Length), standard deviation (SD) of the excursions, and spectral measure (mean power Spectrum Level and Median Frequency), along the medio-lateral (ML) and antero-posterior (AP) direction were computed. Sway Area was more strongly associated than Path Length with CoP SD and, consequently, with mean Spectrum Level for both ML and AP, and both visual and surface conditions. The squared-SD directly specified the mean power Spectrum Level of CoP excursions (ML and AP) in all conditions. Median Frequency was hardly related to Spectrum Level. Adaptation had a confounding effect, whereby equal values of Sway Area, Path Length, and Spectrum Level corresponded to different Median Frequency values. Mean Spectrum Level and SDs of the time series of CoP ML and AP excursions convey the same meaning and bear an acceptable correspondence with Sway Area values. Shifts in Median Frequency values represent important indications of neuromuscular control of stance and of the effects of vision, support conditions, and adaptation. The Romberg Quotient EC/EO for a given variable is contingent on the compliance of the base of support and adaptation, and different between Sway Area and Path Length, but similar between Sway Area and Spectrum Level (AP and ML). These measures must be taken with caution in clinical studies, and considered together in order to get a reliable indication of overall body sway, of modifications by sensory and standing condition, and of changes with ageing, medical conditions and rehabilitation treatment. However, distinct measures shed light on the discrete mechanisms and complex processes underpinning the maintenance of stance.

Citing Articles

Closing the gap while standing still: clinimetric properties of a low-cost balance platform and a user-friendly app for posturography.

Vredeveld T, Stins J, van Vliet A, Tuinder V, Ramaekers S, Coppieters M PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18299.

PMID: 39926035 PMC: 11804768. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18299.


Pupillometry as a biomarker of postural control: Deep-learning models reveal side-specific pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance tasks.

Rosker J, Leskovec T, Tomazin K, Majcen Rosker Z Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14667.

PMID: 39135357 PMC: 11579225. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14667.


The 'Postural Rhythm' of the Ground Reaction Force during Upright Stance and Its Conversion to Body Sway-The Effect of Vision, Support Surface and Adaptation to Repeated Trials.

Sozzi S, Ghai S, Schieppati M Brain Sci. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37508910 PMC: 10377030. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13070978.


Vertical ground reaction force oscillation during standing on hard and compliant surfaces: The "postural rhythm".

Sozzi S, Do M, Schieppati M Front Neurol. 2022; 13:975752.

PMID: 36119676 PMC: 9475112. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.975752.

References
1.
Dewhurst S, Peacock L, Bampouras T . Postural stability of older female Scottish country dancers in comparison with physically active controls. J Aging Phys Act. 2014; 23(1):128-32. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2013-0050. View

2.
Shin S, Milosevic M, Chung C, Lee Y . Contractile properties of superficial skeletal muscle affect postural control in healthy young adults: A test of the rambling and trembling hypothesis. PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0223850. PMC: 6797098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223850. View

3.
Reed C, Chaudhari A, Worthen-Chaudhari L, Bigelow K, Monfort S . A new perspective on transient characteristics of quiet stance postural control. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0237246. PMC: 7416949. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237246. View

4.
Bargiotas I, Audiffren J, Vayatis N, Vidal P, Buffat S, Yelnik A . On the importance of local dynamics in statokinesigram: A multivariate approach for postural control evaluation in elderly. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2):e0192868. PMC: 5825048. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192868. View

5.
Lin D, Seol H, Nussbaum M, Madigan M . Reliability of COP-based postural sway measures and age-related differences. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(2):337-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.005. View