» Articles » PMID: 35916602

Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval

Abstract

The effectiveness and efficiency of cancer screening in real-world settings depend on many factors, including test sensitivity and specificity. Outside of select experimental studies, not everyone receives a gold standard test that can serve as a comparator in estimating screening test accuracy. Thus, many studies of screening test accuracy use the passage of time to infer whether or not cancer was present at the time of the screening test, particularly for patients with a negative screening test. We define the accuracy assessment interval as the period of time after a screening test that is used to estimate the test's accuracy. We describe how the length of this interval may bias sensitivity and specificity estimates. We call for future research to quantify bias and uncertainty in accuracy estimates and to provide guidance on setting accuracy assessment interval lengths for different cancers and screening modalities.

Citing Articles

AI Applied to Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Profiles from Exhaled Breath Air for Early Detection of Lung Cancer.

Vinhas M, Leitao P, Raimundo B, Gil N, Vaz P, Luis-Ferreira F Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38927906 PMC: 11201396. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122200.


Revisiting the standard blueprint for biomarker development to address emerging cancer early detection technologies.

Etzioni R, Gulati R, Patriotis C, Rutter C, Zheng Y, Srivastava S J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 116(2):189-193.

PMID: 37941446 PMC: 10852609. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad227.

References
1.
Zorzi M, Guzzinati S, Puliti D, Paci E . A simple method to estimate the episode and programme sensitivity of breast cancer screening programmes. J Med Screen. 2010; 17(3):132-8. DOI: 10.1258/jms.2010.009060. View

2.
Glueck D, Lamb M, ODonnell C, Ringham B, Brinton J, Muller K . Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:4. PMC: 2657218. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-4. View

3.
Umemneku Chikere C, Wilson K, Allen A, Vale L . Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021; 21(1):67. PMC: 8040223. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01255-4. View

4.
Elena P, Nehmat H, Ermes M, Piera C, Maria Q, Guia M . Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiological review. Breast. 2009; 18(3):208-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.03.004. View

5.
OSullivan J, Banerjee A, Heneghan C, Pluddemann A . Verification bias. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018; 23(2):54-55. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110919. View