» Articles » PMID: 18078561

Sensitivity in Cancer Screening

Overview
Journal J Med Screen
Specialty Public Health
Date 2007 Dec 15
PMID 18078561
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We propose three concepts of sensitivity in cancer screening and apply to data on prostate cancer. Conceptual entities: Sensitivity is the indicator on the ability of screening to find cancer in the detectable preclinical phase (DPCP). The ability is usually specified as to the screening test. We call this entity the test sensitivity. Test positivity with histological confirmation refers to the full diagnostic process and we call the corresponding entity as episode sensitivity. Ultimately, a screening programme identifies a proportion of cancers in the DPCP in the total target population, that we call programme sensitivity. We derive the formulae for these three sensitivities consistent with the incidence method.

Example: Our example on estimation of the three sensitivities is from a randomized screening trial for prostate cancer in Finland. The estimates by incidence method were substantially different, 85% for test sensitivity, 48% for episode sensitivity and 36% for programme sensitivity.

Conclusion: More than one concept of sensitivity with standard method of estimation is needed to describe the ability of screening to identify the disease in the DPCP.

Citing Articles

Projecting the Impact of Multi-Cancer Early Detection on Late-Stage Incidence Using Multi-State Disease Modeling.

Lange J, Gogebakan K, Gulati R, Etzioni R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(6):830-837.

PMID: 38506751 PMC: 11213491. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1470.


Revisiting the standard blueprint for biomarker development to address emerging cancer early detection technologies.

Etzioni R, Gulati R, Patriotis C, Rutter C, Zheng Y, Srivastava S J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 116(2):189-193.

PMID: 37941446 PMC: 10852609. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad227.


Estimating stage-specific sensitivity for cancer screening tests.

Pinsky P, Lange J, Etzioni R J Med Screen. 2023; 30(2):69-73.

PMID: 36734139 PMC: 10245292. DOI: 10.1177/09691413231154801.


Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program.

Breekveldt E, Toes-Zoutendijk E, van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer H, de Jonge L, Kooyker A, Spaander M Int J Cancer. 2022; 152(8):1536-1546.

PMID: 36444504 PMC: 10107864. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34373.


Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval.

Chubak J, Burnett-Hartman A, Barlow W, Corley D, Croswell J, Neslund-Dudas C Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022; 31(8):1517-1520.

PMID: 35916602 PMC: 9484579. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0232.