» Articles » PMID: 35914149

Random Encounters and Amoeba Locomotion Drive the Predation of by

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Aug 1
PMID 35914149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predatory protozoa play an essential role in shaping microbial populations. Among these protozoa, are ubiquitous in the soil and aqueous environments inhabited by . Observations of predator-prey interactions between these two microorganisms revealed a predation strategy in which assemble in aggregates, termed backpacks, on their posterior. The rapid formation and specific location of backpacks led to the assumption that may recruit by releasing an attractant. However, this hypothesis has not been validated, and the mechanisms driving this process remained unknown. Here, we combined video microscopy, microfluidics, single-cell image analyses, and theoretical modeling to characterize predator-prey interactions of and and determined whether bacterial chemotaxis contributes to the backpack formation. Our results indicate that captures are not driven by chemotaxis. Instead, random encounters of bacteria with amoebae initialize bacterial capture and aggregation. This is supported by the strong correlation between experimentally derived capture rates and theoretical encounter models at the single-cell level. Observations of the spatial rearrangement of trapped by revealed that bacterial aggregation into backpacks is mainly driven by amoeboid locomotion. Overall, we show that two nonspecific, independent mechanisms, namely random encounters enhanced by bacterial motility and predator surface-bound locomotion, drive backpack formation, resulting in a bacterial aggregate on the amoeba ready for phagocytosis. Due to the prevalence of these two processes in the environment, we expect this strategy to be widespread among amoebae, contributing to their effectiveness as predators.

Citing Articles

Multiplexed Microfluidic Platform for Parallel Bacterial Chemotaxis Assays.

Stehnach M, Henshaw R, Floge S, Guasto J Bio Protoc. 2024; 14(17):e5062.

PMID: 39282234 PMC: 11393045. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5062.


Unravelling mechanisms of bacterial recognition by Acanthamoeba: insights into microbial ecology and immune responses.

Nasher F, Wren B Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1405133.

PMID: 39247694 PMC: 11377244. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1405133.


Enhanced transport of bacteria along root systems by protists can impact plant health.

Micciulla J, Shor L, Gage D Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(4):e0201123.

PMID: 38534145 PMC: 11022564. DOI: 10.1128/aem.02011-23.


Zooming in on the intracellular microbiome composition of bacterivorous isolates.

Rayamajhee B, Willcox M, Sharma S, Mooney R, Petsoglou C, Badenoch P ISME Commun. 2024; 4(1):ycae016.

PMID: 38500701 PMC: 10945361. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae016.


Flagellin -linked glycans are required for the interactions between and .

Nasher F, Wren B Microbiology (Reading). 2023; 169(8).

PMID: 37610804 PMC: 10482376. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001386.

References
1.
Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G . Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003; 16(2):273-307. PMC: 153146. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.273-307.2003. View

2.
Fieseler L, Doyscher D, Loessner M, Schuppler M . Acanthamoeba release compounds which promote growth of Listeria monocytogenes and other bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(7):3091-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5534-9. View

3.
Stowe M, Tumlinson J, Heath R . Chemical mimicry: bolas spiders emit components of moth prey species sex pheromones. Science. 1987; 236(4804):964-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.236.4804.964. View

4.
Bowers B, Korn E . The fine structure of Acanthamoeba castellanii (Neff strain). II. Encystment. J Cell Biol. 1969; 41(3):786-805. PMC: 2107820. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.41.3.786. View

5.
Alsam S, Sissons J, Dudley R, Khan N . Mechanisms associated with Acanthamoeba castellanii (T4) phagocytosis. Parasitol Res. 2005; 96(6):402-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-005-1401-z. View