» Articles » PMID: 35906868

Interpretation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis from Recumbent Cows Using Different Thresholds of Red Blood Cell Count

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 30
PMID 35906868
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hemodilution of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) could confound interpretation of results. Accurately predicting total nucleated cells count (TNCC) and total protein concentration (TPC) attributable to hemodilution is difficult.

Objective: To determine the effects of hemodilution on TPC and TNCC in bovine CSF.

Methods: Retrospective review of CSF analysis results of downer dairy cows treated at Centre hospitalier universitaire vétérinaire between January 2006 and December 2014. Descriptive statistics were performed using 3 scenarios.

Results: Among the 235 samples included, red blood cell (RBC) count (RBCC) ranged from 0 to 869 220 RBC/μL (median = 6.6), TPC ranged from 0.04 to 6.51 g/L (median = 0.27), and TNCC ranged from 0 to 7500 cell/μL (median = 1.1). Among the 157 samples that had <30 RBC/μL (a threshold used in other species), TPC and TNCC varied between 0.13 and 1.06 g/L (median = 0.27) and between 0 and 31.4 cell/μL (median = 0.6), respectively. Eighty-four samples had TPC <0.25 g/L and TNCC ≤4.5 cell/μL. Among those 84 samples, RBCC varied between 0 and 1290 RBC/μL (median = 4.7). In 20 samples, TNCC was 0 with a variation in RBCC between 0 and 840 RBC/μL (median = 3.9). No strong correlations between RBCC and TNCC and TPC were found.

Conclusions: A cutoff around 200 RBC/μL is proposed as clinically meaninful in bovine CSF. Results between 200 and 1290 RBC/μL are equivocal.

Citing Articles

Comparison of atlantoaxial and lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid centesis techniques in South American camelids.

Malmstrom E, Cole R, Hofmeister E, Stern J, Passler T J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 38(2):1232-1239.

PMID: 38407387 PMC: 10937480. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17023.


Interpretation of cerebrospinal fluid analysis from recumbent cows using different thresholds of red blood cell count.

Puerto-Parada M, Arango-Sabogal J, Bilodeau M, Bedard C, Francoz D, Desrochers A J Vet Intern Med. 2022; 36(5):1837-1842.

PMID: 35906868 PMC: 9511068. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.16502.

References
1.
Rand J, Parent J, Jacobs R, Percy D . Reference intervals for feline cerebrospinal fluid: cell counts and cytologic features. Am J Vet Res. 1990; 51(7):1044-8. View

2.
Miller M, Sweeney C, RUSSELL G, Sheetz R, Morrow J . Effects of blood contamination of cerebrospinal fluid on western blot analysis for detection of antibodies against Sarcocystis neurona and on albumin quotient and immunoglobulin G index in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999; 215(1):67-71. View

3.
Welles E, PUGH D, Wenzel J, Sorjonen D . Composition of cerebrospinal fluid in healthy adult llamas. Am J Vet Res. 1994; 55(8):1075-9. View

4.
Sweeney C, RUSSELL G . Differences in total protein concentration, nucleated cell count, and red blood cell count among sequential samples of cerebrospinal fluid from horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000; 217(1):54-7. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.54. View

5.
Barkovits K, Kruse N, Linden A, Tonges L, Pfeiffer K, Mollenhauer B . Blood Contamination in CSF and Its Impact on Quantitative Analysis of Alpha-Synuclein. Cells. 2020; 9(2). PMC: 7072133. DOI: 10.3390/cells9020370. View