» Articles » PMID: 35899077

A Critical Analysis of Industrial Human-Robot Communication and Its Quest for Naturalness Through the Lens of Complexity Theory

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2022 Jul 28
PMID 35899077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human-robot communication is one of the actively researched fields to enable efficient and seamless collaboration between a human and an intelligent industrial robotic system. The field finds its roots in human communication with the aim to achieve the "naturalness" inherent in the latter. Industrial human-robot communication pursues communication with simplistic commands and gestures, which is not representative of an uncontrolled real-world industrial environment. In addition, naturalness in communication is a consequence of its dynamism, typically ignored as a design criterion in industrial human-robot communication. Complexity Theory-based natural communication models allow for a more accurate representation of human communication which, when adapted, could also benefit the field of human-robot communication. This paper presents a perspective by reviewing the state of human-robot communication in industrial settings and then presents a critical analysis of the same through the lens of Complexity Theory. Furthermore, the work identifies research gaps in the aforementioned field, fulfilling which, would propel the field towards a truly natural form of communication. Finally, the work briefly discusses a general framework that leverages the experiential learning of data-based techniques and naturalness of human knowledge.

References
1.
Spezialetti M, Placidi G, Rossi S . Emotion Recognition for Human-Robot Interaction: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Front Robot AI. 2021; 7:532279. PMC: 7806093. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.532279. View

2.
Baron J, Hershey J, Kunreuther H . Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Anal. 2000; 20(4):413-27. DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.204041. View

3.
Tidoni E, Holle H, Scandola M, Schindler I, Hill L, Cross E . Human but not robotic gaze facilitates action prediction. iScience. 2022; 25(6):104462. PMC: 9189121. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104462. View

4.
Glik D . Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28:33-54. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123. View

5.
Du G, Long S, Li F, Huang X . Active Collision Avoidance for Human-Robot Interaction With UKF, Expert System, and Artificial Potential Field Method. Front Robot AI. 2021; 5:125. PMC: 7805694. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00125. View