» Articles » PMID: 35894009

Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound

Overview
Journal Tomography
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35894009
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using transperineal ultrasound and evaluated the differences in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We generated different multivariate binary logistic regression models using nonautomated methods to predict UP, including the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. The parameters were added progressively according to their simplicity of use and their predictive capacity for identifying UP. We used two binary logistic regression models to predict UP. Model 1 was based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient [AUC: 0.967 (95% CI, 0.939−0.995; p < 0.0005)]. Model 2 used the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, age, avulsion and ballooning (AUC: 0.971 (95% CI, 0.945−0.997; p < 0.0005)). In conclusion, the model based on the difference in the pubis−uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient could predict 96.7% of patients with UP.

Citing Articles

Epidural Anesthesia and Pelvic Floor Outcomes in Primiparas: A Retrospective Transperineal Ultrasound Study.

Lyu X, Zhu L, Zhang W, Chen H Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(1):163-171.

PMID: 39621064 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-06000-1.


Applicability of Deep Learning to Dynamically Identify the Different Organs of the Pelvic Floor in the Midsagittal Plane.

Garcia-Mejido J, Solis-Martin D, Martin-Moran M, Fernandez-Conde C, Fernandez-Palacin F, Sainz-Bueno J Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(12):2285-2293.

PMID: 38913129 PMC: 11732871. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05841-0.

References
1.
GREEN Jr T . Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 122(3):368-400. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90186-6. View

2.
Dietz H, Pattillo Garnham A, Guzman Rojas R . Is it necessary to diagnose levator avulsion on pelvic floor muscle contraction?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 49(2):252-256. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15832. View

3.
Broekhuis S, Futterer J, Barentsz J, Vierhout M, Kluivers K . A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20(6):721-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0848-3. View

4.
Orejuela F, Shek K, Dietz H . The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 23(2):175-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1533-x. View

5.
Molina F, Nicolaides K . Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27(2):61-7. DOI: 10.1159/000287588. View