Porto D, DellAquilla A, da Silveira L, Pistelli L, Haddad J, Baracat E
Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(1):177-187.
PMID: 39636465
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05970-6.
Coppola C, Fochesato C, Esposito G, Ferrazzi E, Orsi M
J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(4):681-689.
PMID: 39635975
PMC: 11892082.
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16627.
Pietrus M, Pitynski K, Socha M, Gawron I, Biskupski-Brawura-Samaha R, Waligora M
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).
PMID: 39594215
PMC: 11592590.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222549.
Rudavsky A
Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(11):2159-2170.
PMID: 39382645
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05949-3.
Garcia-Mejido J, Solis-Martin D, Martin-Moran M, Fernandez-Conde C, Fernandez-Palacin F, Sainz-Bueno J
Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 35(12):2285-2293.
PMID: 38913129
PMC: 11732871.
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05841-0.
Changes in Pelvic Floor Ultrasonographic Features after Flat Magnetic Stimulation in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain and Levator Ani Muscle Hypertonicity.
Barba M, Cola A, De Vicari D, Costa C, La Greca G, Vigna A
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(3).
PMID: 38541100
PMC: 10971865.
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60030374.
Digital Examination vs. 4D Transperineal Ultrasound-Do They Compare in Labour Management? A Pilot Study.
Exner F, Caspers R, Kennes L, Wittenborn J, Kupec T, Stickeler E
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(3).
PMID: 38337809
PMC: 10854967.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030293.
Pelvic floor status in opera singers. a pilot study using transperineal ultrasound.
Volloyhaug I, Semmingsen T, Laukkanen A, Karoliussen C, Bjorkoy K
BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):67.
PMID: 38267929
PMC: 10809662.
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-02895-6.
Pelvic floor function after third and fourth degree perineal lacerations: a case-control study on quality of life.
Sartore A, Scalia M, Mangino F, Savastano G, Magni E, Ricci G
BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):12.
PMID: 38172805
PMC: 10765914.
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02739-9.
The acute effects of running on pelvic floor morphology and function in runners with and without running-induced stress urinary incontinence.
Berube M, McLean L
Int Urogynecol J. 2023; 35(1):127-138.
PMID: 37991566
PMC: 10811036.
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05674-3.
Relationship between Q-Tip Test and Urethral Hypermobility on Perineal Ultrasound.
Long C, Loo Z, Wu C, Lin K, Yeh C, Feng C
J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).
PMID: 37510978
PMC: 10381566.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144863.
Postoperative Physiotherapy in Women Undergoing Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Brandt C, van Vuuren E
Physiother Can. 2023; 74(2):126-138.
PMID: 37323710
PMC: 10262738.
DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0053.
A randomised interventional parallel study to evaluate the effect of different frequencies of pelvic floor muscle exercises with core stabilisation using three-dimensional ultrasound: the PELSTAB study.
Hagovska M, Svihra J, Urdzik P, Vaska E
Int Urogynecol J. 2023; 34(9):2049-2060.
PMID: 36917257
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05473-w.
Predictive Value of Pelvic Floor Muscle Morphometry Using 3D/4D Ultrasound in Relation to the Success of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Hagovska M, Svihra J, Urdzik P
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(22).
PMID: 36429476
PMC: 9690680.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214757.
Are Transperineal Ultrasound Parameters Useful to Predict Incontinence in Patients with Single-Incision Mini-Slings?.
Garcia-Mejido J, Blasco-Hernandez P, Fernandez-Conde C, Garcia-Pombo S, Fernandez-Palacin A, Borrero C
Tomography. 2022; 8(5):2556-2564.
PMID: 36287812
PMC: 9609347.
DOI: 10.3390/tomography8050213.
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound.
Garcia-Mejido J, Ramos-Vega Z, Fernandez-Palacin A, Borrero C, Valdivia M, Pelayo-Delgado I
Tomography. 2022; 8(4):1716-1725.
PMID: 35894009
PMC: 9326672.
DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040144.
Re: The role of transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence.
Rios L
Int Braz J Urol. 2022; 48(2):379-380.
PMID: 35170908
PMC: 8932018.
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1100.1.
2D ultrasound diagnosis of middle compartment prolapse: a multicenter study.
Garcia-Mejido J, Gonzalez-Diaz E, Ortega I, Borrero C, Fernandez-Palacin A, Sainz-Bueno J
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(2):959-966.
PMID: 35111597
PMC: 8739112.
DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-707.
A New Angle Measurement in Translabial Ultrasound as an Adjunct for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Nam G, Song J, Lee S
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(1).
PMID: 35054265
PMC: 8775178.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010098.
The Combined Measurement of Pelvic Organ Mobility and Hiatus Area Improves the Sensitivity of Transperineal Ultrasound When Detecting Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Wen X, Tian H, Yan X, Sun Q, Du Y, Wen D
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:727711.
PMID: 34778290
PMC: 8578727.
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.727711.