Novel Polyurethane Scaffolds Containing Sucrose Crosslinker for Dental Application

Overview

Journal Int J Mol Sci

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Molecular Biology

Date 2022 Jul 27

PMID 35887250

Authors

Marcell Arpad Kordovan

Csaba Hegedus

Katalin Czifrak

Csilla Lakatos

Ibolya Kalman-Szabo

Lajos Daroczi

Miklos Zsuga

Sandor Keki

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In this paper, the synthesis, characterization, and properties of crosslinked poly(ε-caprolactone)-based polyurethanes as potential tissue replacement materials are reported. The polyurethane prepolymers were prepared from poly(ε-caprolactone)diol (PCD), polyethylene glycol (PEG)/polylactic acid diol (PLAD), and 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI). In these segmented polyurethanes, the role of PEG/PLAD was to tune the hydrophobic/hydrophilic character of the resulting polymer while sucrose served as a crosslinking agent. PLAD was synthesized by the polycondensation reaction of D,L-lactic acid and investigated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). The crosslinked polyurethane samples (SUPURs) obtained were characterized by attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (AT-FT-IR), swelling, and mechanical (uniaxial tensile tests) experiments. The thermo and thermomechanical behavior were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamical mechanical analysis (DMA). The viability of dental pulp stem cells was investigated in the case of polyurethanes composed of fully biocompatible elements. In our studies, none of our polymers showed toxicity to stem cells (DPSCs).

Citing Articles

Synthesis of an Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid-like Ligand Based on Sucrose Scaffold and Complexation and Proton Relaxivity Studies of Its Gadolinium(III) Complex in Solution.

Zhang P, Barbot C, Gandikota R, Li C, Gouriou L, Gouhier G Molecules. 2024; 29(19).

PMID: 39407616 PMC: 11478042. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29194688.

Bio-Based Polyurethane Networks Containing Sunflower Oil Based Polyols.

Czifrak K, Lakatos C, Cserhati C, Vecsei G, Zsuga M, Keki S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(13).

PMID: 39000407 PMC: 11242490. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137300.

Investigation of Soft Matter Nanomechanics by Atomic Force Microscopy and Optical Tweezers: A Comprehensive Review.

Magazzu A, Marcuello C Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36985857 PMC: 10053849. DOI: 10.3390/nano13060963.

Fabrication of Polyurethane Elastomer/Hindered Phenol Composites with Tunable Damping Property.

Zhao X, Jin R, Niu Z, Gao Y, Hu S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36902089 PMC: 10003405. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054662.

Flexible Investment Casting Wax Patterns for 3D-Printing: Their Rheological and Mechanical Characterizations.

Szabo L, Deak G, Nyul D, Keki S Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(21).

PMID: 36365739 PMC: 9657807. DOI: 10.3390/polym14214744.

References

Solanki A, Das M, Thakore S . A review on carbohydrate embedded polyurethanes: An emerging area in the scope of biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2017; 181:1003-1016. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.049. View

Kelch S, Steuer S, Schmidt A, Lendlein A . Shape-memory polymer networks from oligo[(epsilon-hydroxycaproate)-co-glycolate]dimethacrylates and butyl acrylate with adjustable hydrolytic degradation rate. Biomacromolecules. 2007; 8(3):1018-27. DOI: 10.1021/bm0610370. View

Gittens R, Scheideler L, Rupp F, Hyzy S, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schwartz Z . A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10(7):2907-18. PMC: 4103435. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.032. View

Palaveniene A, Songailiene K, Baniukaitiene O, Tamburaci S, Kimna C, Tihminlioglu F . The effect of biomimetic coating and cuttlebone microparticle reinforcement on the osteoconductive properties of cellulose-based scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 152:1194-1204. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.213. View

Marcuello C, Foulon L, Chabbert B, Molinari M, Aguie-Beghin V . Langmuir-Blodgett Procedure to Precisely Control the Coverage of Functionalized AFM Cantilevers for SMFS Measurements: Application with Cellulose Nanocrystals. Langmuir. 2018; 34(32):9376-9386. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01892. View

Karger-Kocsis J, Keki S . Review of Progress in Shape Memory Epoxies and Their Composites. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 10(1). PMC: 6415015. DOI: 10.3390/polym10010034. View

Norouz F, Halabian R, Salimi A, Ghollasi M . A new nanocomposite scaffold based on polyurethane and clay nanoplates for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019; 103:109857. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109857. View

Schneider C, Rasband W, Eliceiri K . NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):671-5. PMC: 5554542. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. View

Vassallo V, Tsianaka A, Alessio N, Grubel J, Cammarota M, Tovar G . Evaluation of novel biomaterials for cartilage regeneration based on gelatin methacryloyl interpenetrated with extractive chondroitin sulfate or unsulfated biotechnological chondroitin. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022; 110(6):1210-1223. PMC: 9306773. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37364. View

10.

Sordi M, Cruz A, Fredel M, Magini R, Sharpe P . Three-dimensional bioactive hydrogel-based scaffolds for bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021; 124:112055. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112055. View

11.

Guo L, Liang Z, Yang L, Du W, Yu T, Tang H . The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2021; 338:571-582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055. View

12.

Jurak M, Wiacek A, Ladniak A, Przykaza K, Szafran K . What affects the biocompatibility of polymers?. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021; 294:102451. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102451. View

13.

Kerenyi F, Tarapcsak S, Hrubi E, Barathne S, Hegedus V, Balogh S . [Comparison of sorting of fluorescently and magnetically labelled dental pulp stem cells]. Fogorv Sz. 2016; 109(1):29-33. View

14.

Lakatos C, Kordovan M, Czifrak K, Nagy L, Vadkerti B, Daroczi L . Synthesis of Sucrose-HDI Cooligomers: New Polyols for Novel Polyurethane Networks. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(3). PMC: 8836168. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031444. View

15.

Kadar K, Kiraly M, Porcsalmy B, Molnar B, Racz G, Blazsek J . Differentiation potential of stem cells from human dental origin - promise for tissue engineering. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010; 60 Suppl 7:167-75. View

16.

Solanki A, Mehta J, Thakore S . Structure-property relationships and biocompatibility of carbohydrate crosslinked polyurethanes. Carbohydr Polym. 2014; 110:338-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.021. View

17.

Dwivedi R, Kumar S, Pandey R, Mahajan A, Nandana D, Katti D . Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019; 10(1):381-388. PMC: 6854079. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.10.003. View

18.

de Oliveira Barud H, da Silva R, Borges M, Castro G, Lima Ribeiro S, Barud H . Bacterial Nanocellulose in Dentistry: Perspectives and Challenges. Molecules. 2020; 26(1). PMC: 7796422. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26010049. View

19.

Nagy L, Vadkerti B, Lakatos C, Feher P, Zsuga M, Keki S . Kinetically Equivalent Functionality and Reactivity of Commonly Used Biocompatible Polyurethane Crosslinking Agents. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(8). PMC: 8071031. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084059. View

20.

Nagy L, Nagy M, Vadkerti B, Daroczi L, Deak G, Zsuga M . Designed Polyurethanes for Potential Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications: Novel Synthetic Strategy for Preparing Sucrose Containing Biocompatible and Biodegradable Polyurethane Networks. Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(5). PMC: 6587335. DOI: 10.3390/polym11050825. View