» Articles » PMID: 35886089

Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 27
PMID 35886089
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the attendance and determinants of organized cervical and breast cancer (two-cancer) screening, especially higher-level factors, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in central China from June 2018 to November 2019 among 1949 women (age ≥ 35 years). We examined organizer-level factors, provider-level factors, receiver-lever factors and attendance and participation willingness of screening. The results indicate that the attendance and participation willingness of organized two-cancer screening was 61.19% and 77.15%, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounders, women who received screening notification were more likely to have greater participation willingness and higher attendance than those who received no notification (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.99; aOR = 98.03, 95% CI: 51.44-186.82, respectively). Compared with being notified about screening by GPs, being notified by community women's leaders and other community leaders were more likely to lead to greater willingness to participate again (aOR = 2.86, 95% CI: 1.13-7.24; aOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.26-8.48, respectively) and recommending screening to others (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.02-4.65; aOR = 4.14, 95% CI: 1.84-9.30, respectively). The results suggest that notification of women about screening by community leaders is an important organizer-level factor. As a part of public health services, the design and implementation of optimal cancer screening strategies may require public-sector involvement at the organizer level instead of a one-man show by the health sector.

Citing Articles

Modeling optimal combination of breast and cervical cancer screening strategies in China.

Liu X, Wang Y, Gao B, Lu X, Wang Y, Lu W BMC Womens Health. 2025; 25(1):56.

PMID: 39923068 PMC: 11807319. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03573-x.


Screening attendance of breast or cervical cancers and its associated factors among 30-49 year old women in Gedeo zone, South Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study.

Demeke A, Deribe B, Girma M, Gizaw M, Getachew S, Unverzagt S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315891.

PMID: 39888894 PMC: 11785269. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315891.


Colorectal cancer research priorities in Uganda: perspectives from local key experts and stakeholders.

Matovu N, Mugisha N, Jatho A, McShane C Future Oncol. 2024; 20(39):3169-3177.

PMID: 39453024 PMC: 11633408. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2416885.


The burden of cervical cancer in China.

Shen X, Cheng Y, Ren F, Shi Z Front Oncol. 2022; 12:979809.

PMID: 36203427 PMC: 9530827. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.979809.

References
1.
Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin S . Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010; 2010(40):38-57. PMC: 3731433. DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq008. View

2.
Basu P, Selmouni F, Belakhel L, Sauvaget C, Abousselham L, Lucas E . Breast Cancer Screening Program in Morocco: Status of implementation, organization and performance. Int J Cancer. 2018; 143(12):3273-3280. PMC: 6637920. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31749. View

3.
Kurani S, McCoy R, Lampman M, Doubeni C, Finney Rutten L, Inselman J . Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(3):e200618. PMC: 7063513. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618. View

4.
Haas J, Vogeli C, Yu L, Atlas S, Skinner C, Harris K . Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening. Prev Med Rep. 2021; 23:101468. PMC: 8254123. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101468. View

5.
Fang C, Ma G, Handorf E, Feng Z, Tan Y, Rhee J . Addressing multilevel barriers to cervical cancer screening in Korean American women: A randomized trial of a community-based intervention. Cancer. 2016; 123(6):1018-1026. PMC: 5339039. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30391. View