» Articles » PMID: 35875213

Flow Test by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative Reveals Distinct Viscosity Parameters of Three Thickening Agents

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 25
PMID 35875213
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) flow test is useful for the global standardization of food consistencies of dysphagia patients. In clinical practice, different compositions of food thickeners are commonly used, directly influencing viscosity parameters and swallowing physiology. We aimed to compare the IDDSI thickness levels, remaining volume in the syringe (RVS), and viscosity parameters of three different food thickeners. As a secondary objective, we compared the cost of preparing 100 mL of thickened drinks using the studied thickeners. Thickeners A (xanthan gum), B (corn starch, tara gum, xanthan gum, and guar gum), and C (corn starch) were prepared in increasing concentrations from 1 to 7 g/100 mL and were assayed in quintuplicate using the IDDSI flow test. Thickeners A, B, and C presented statistically different results for the IDDSI levels, RVS, and viscosity parameters at all concentrations. Thickener A reached higher levels in the IDDSI framework, RVS, and viscosity parameters compared with thickeners B and C. A large range of RVS was observed at different concentrations for thickener B compared with C. Regarding viscosity, thickeners B and C, with corn starch in their composition, showed exponential behavior as concentrations increased, while thickener A presented a linear trend. The thickener composition was significantly influenced by IDDSI classification, RVS, and viscosity parameters. The study shows that xanthan gum thickeners present less variability in IDDSI, RVS, and viscosity compared with starch-based thickeners.

Citing Articles

The influence of temperature variation on the levels of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative.

Santo T, Ponsoni A, de Souza C, Mourao L Codas. 2024; 36(6):e20230315.

PMID: 39292109 PMC: 11405055. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023315pt.

References
1.
Molfenter S, Steele C . The relationship between residue and aspiration on the subsequent swallow: an application of the normalized residue ratio scale. Dysphagia. 2013; 28(4):494-500. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-013-9459-8. View

2.
Park J, Kim H, Oh B, Lee M, Hwang I, Lee S . Comparison of different gum-based thickeners using a viscometer and line spread test: a preliminary study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38(1):94-100. PMC: 3953370. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.1.94. View

3.
Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, Ortega P . Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002; 17(2):139-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-001-0113-5. View

4.
Ortega O, Martin A, Clave P . Diagnosis and Management of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Among Older Persons, State of the Art. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017; 18(7):576-582. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.015. View

5.
Barbon C, Steele C . Thickened Liquids for Dysphagia Management: a Current Review of the Measurement of Liquid Flow. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020; 6(4):220-226. PMC: 7059648. DOI: 10.1007/s40141-018-0197-6. View