The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) Study: Protocol for an Inception Cohort Study

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2022 Jul 21

PMID 35864487

Authors

Sean D Rundell

Ayumi Saito

Eric N Meier

Stephanie T Danyluk

Jeffrey G Jarvik

Kelley Seebeck

Janna L Friedly

Patrick J Heagerty

Sandra K Johnston

Monica Smersh

Maggie E Horn

Pradeep Suri

Amy M Cizik

Adam P Goode

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative condition that contributes to back and back-related leg pain in older adults. Most patients with symptomatic LSS initially receive non-operative care before surgical consultation. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding prognosis for patients seeking non-surgical care. The overall goal of this project is to develop and evaluate a clinically useful model to predict long-term physical function of patients initiating non-surgical care for symptomatic LSS.

Methods: This is a protocol for an inception cohort study of adults 50 years and older who are initiating non-surgical care for symptomatic LSS in a secondary care setting. We plan to recruit up to 625 patients at two study sites. We exclude patients with prior lumbar spine surgeries or those who are planning on lumbar spine surgery. We also exclude patients with serious medical conditions that have back pain as a symptom or limit walking. We are using weekly, automated data pulls from the electronic health records to identify potential participants. We then contact patients by email and telephone within 21 days of a new visit to determine eligibility, obtain consent, and enroll participants. We collect data using telephone interviews, web-based surveys, and queries of electronic health records. Participants are followed for 12 months, with surveys completed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the 8-item PROMIS Physical Function (PF) Short Form. We will identify distinct phenotypes using PROMIS PF scores at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months using group-based trajectory modeling. We will develop and evaluate the performance of a multivariable prognostic model to predict 12-month physical function using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and will compare performance to other machine learning methods. Internal validation will be conducted using k-folds cross-validation.

Discussion: This study will be one of the largest cohorts of individuals with symptomatic LSS initiating new episodes of non-surgical care. The successful completion of this project will produce a cross-validated prognostic model for LSS that can be used to tailor treatment approaches for patient care and clinical trials.

References

Haagsma J, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany E . The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2015; 22(1):3-18. PMC: 4752630. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041616. View

Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Chaloupka R, Bednarik J . Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(2):369-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3411-y. View

Cook C, Brown C, Michael K, Isaacs R, Howes C, Richardson W . The clinical value of a cluster of patient history and observational findings as a diagnostic support tool for lumbar spine stenosis. Physiother Res Int. 2010; 16(3):170-8. DOI: 10.1002/pri.500. View

Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith F . Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):1919-24. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd. View

Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H . Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(6):783-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.02.656. View

Mamisch N, Brumann M, Hodler J, Held U, Brunner F, Steurer J . Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey. Radiology. 2012; 264(1):174-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111930. View

Tomkins-Lane C, Melloh M, Lurie J, Smuck M, Battie M, Freeman B . ISSLS Prize Winner: Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results of an International Delphi Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(15):1239-1246. PMC: 4966995. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001476. View

Resnik L, Gozalo P, Hart D . Weighted index explained more variance in physical function than an additively scored functional comorbidity scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 64(3):320-30. PMC: 2989420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.019. View

Haig A, Tong H, Yamakawa K, Parres C, Quint D, Chiodo A . Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(25):2950-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000247791.97032.1e. View

10.

Kuittinen P, Sipola P, Saari T, Aalto T, Sinikallio S, Savolainen S . Visually assessed severity of lumbar spinal canal stenosis is paradoxically associated with leg pain and objective walking ability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:348. PMC: 4203914. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-348. View

11.

Gray D, Deyo R, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Heagerty P, Comstock B . Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17):1957-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229148.63418.c1. View

12.

Sigmundsson F, Kang X, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B . Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression. Acta Orthop. 2011; 82(2):204-10. PMC: 3235292. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566150. View

13.

Wessberg P, Frennered K . Central lumbar spinal stenosis: natural history of non-surgical patients. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(10):2536-2542. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5075-x. View

14.

Hays R, Spritzer K, Schalet B, Cella D . PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27(7):1885-1891. PMC: 5999556. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3. View

15.

Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz J . Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?. JAMA. 2010; 304(23):2628-36. PMC: 3260477. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1833. View

16.

Friedly J, Bresnahan B, Comstock B, Turner J, Deyo R, Sullivan S . Study protocol- Lumbar Epidural steroid injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS): a double-blind randomized controlled trial of epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis among older adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13:48. PMC: 3349603. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-48. View

17.

Friedly J, Comstock B, Turner J, Heagerty P, Deyo R, Sullivan S . A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313265. View

18.

Rundell S, Pennings J, Nian H, Harrell Jr F, Khan I, Bydon M . Adding 3-month patient data improves prognostic models of 12-month disability, pain, and satisfaction after specific lumbar spine surgical procedures: development and validation of a prediction model. Spine J. 2019; 20(4):600-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.12.010. View

19.

Schalet B, Hays R, Jensen S, Beaumont J, Fries J, Cella D . Validity of PROMIS physical function measured in diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 73:112-8. PMC: 4968197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.039. View

20.

Weber C, Giannadakis C, Rao V, Jakola A, Nerland U, Nygaard O . Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(2):E78-83. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001166. View