» Articles » PMID: 17139226

Predictors of Pain and Function in Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Back Pain

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Dec 2
PMID 17139226
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Longitudinal masked, double-controlled cohort study.

Objectives: To determine prognosis and predictors of function and pain in persons with spinal stenosis.

Summary Of Background Data: The clinical syndrome of spinal stenosis is common and disabling, but not clearly related to anatomic measures. Prognosis not well studied.

Methods: Persons 55 to 80 years of age with and without stenosis on preliminary review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and asymptomatic volunteers underwent screening, questionnaires, physical examination, ambulation testing, masked electromyogram (EMG), and masked MRI scans; these were repeated at >18 months.

Results: Twenty-three asymptomatic, 28 back pain, and 32 clinically diagnosed stenosis subjects underwent follow-up. Although initial and follow-up diagnosis tended to agree (kappa = 0.394, P < 001), there were substantial shifts between the three groups. Among persons with clinically diagnosed stenosis, every measure trended for improvement, including significant changes in pain, ambulation, and EMG. Ambulation velocity and Pain Disability Index at follow-up were predicted by initial disability measures. Pain was predicted by initial sleep difficulty but not initial pain. EMG and MRI did not predict function or pain.

Conclusion: Clinically recognized spinal stenosis is fluctuating and largely improving, and in continuum with back pain and no symptoms. Since anatomic and neurologic deficits do not predict future function, they should not be weighed heavily in surgical risk-benefit discussions.

Citing Articles

A Protocol for a Single-Centered, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Trial Comparing Comprehensive Nonsurgical Therapy Options for Individuals with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Sun Y, An Y, Fan X, Liu C, Li D, Lei Y J Pain Res. 2023; 16:773-784.

PMID: 36923649 PMC: 10010744. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S398897.


The Effectiveness of Pharmacopuncture in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Protocol for a Multi-Centered, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group Study.

Lee J, Park K, Kim S, Seo J, Cho H, Nam D J Pain Res. 2022; 15:2989-2996.

PMID: 36176963 PMC: 9514259. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S382550.


The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) study: protocol for an inception cohort study.

Rundell S, Saito A, Meier E, Danyluk S, Jarvik J, Seebeck K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):692.

PMID: 35864487 PMC: 9306038. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05598-x.


Probability for surgical treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis according to the stenotic lesion severity: a 5-10-year follow-up study.

Kang D, Lee S, Kim H, Park S, Yeom J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):573.

PMID: 35701803 PMC: 9195331. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05510-7.


Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C BMJ. 2016; 352:h6234.

PMID: 26727925 PMC: 6887476. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.