» Articles » PMID: 35859019

Interlaminar Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: a Review of Efficacy and Safety

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2022 Jul 20
PMID 35859019
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spine intervention is an important treatment option for the management of spinal pain, and the numbers of the most representative epidural steroid injection (ESI) procedures performed are expected to increase significantly in the future along with increased life expectancy and the increasing prevalence of spinal disorders. Therefore, it is important to understand the efficacy of ESIs according to each spinal disorder they are administered to treat, and one must be familiar with the possible complications. In fact, although numerous ESI-related articles have been published, there is still considerable controversy regarding the efficacy of ESI procedures. Furthermore, due to the rarity of serious complications, most instances have been recorded in the form of case reports. In this article, we aimed to review the indications of cervical and lumbar ESIs and to compare interlaminar ESI (ILESI) and transforaminal ESI (TFESI) techniques in terms of analgesic efficacy, possible complications, and safety profiles. This article includes opinions based on the authors' experience with ESI indications and efficacy, and presents practical tips for coping with specific situations related to each complication. By combining the dedicated anatomical understanding of radiologists with image-guided interventions, ESI is expected to stand out in the rapidly expanding field of spine intervention.

Citing Articles

The role of psychosocial factors in mediating the treatment response of epidural steroid injections for low back pain with or without lumbosacral radiculopathy: A scoping review.

Stensland M, McGeary D, Covell C, Fitzgerald E, Mojallal M, Lugosi S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316366.

PMID: 39813271 PMC: 11734955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316366.


Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study.

Kose H, Guven Kose S, Celikel F, Tulgar S, Akkaya O J Pers Med. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063975 PMC: 11278421. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070721.

References
1.
Murray C, Dellavalle R, Danaei G, Fahimi A, Flaxman D, Gabriel S . The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013; 310(6):591-608. PMC: 5436627. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805. View

2.
Dieleman J, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A . US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020; 323(9):863-884. PMC: 7054840. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734. View

3.
Lee C, Chung C, Kim C, Kwon J . Health Care Burden of Spinal Diseases in the Republic of Korea: Analysis of a Nationwide Database From 2012 Through 2016. Neurospine. 2018; 15(1):66-76. PMC: 5944630. DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836038.019. View

4.
Koes B, Scholten R, Mens J, Bouter L . Efficacy of epidural steroid injections for low-back pain and sciatica: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Pain. 1995; 63(3):279-288. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00124-7. View

5.
Friedly J, Comstock B, Turner J, Heagerty P, Deyo R, Sullivan S . A randomized trial of epidural glucocorticoid injections for spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(1):11-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313265. View