» Articles » PMID: 35852193

The Evaluation of a De Novo Biplanar Distal Humerus Plate: A Biomechanical Study

Overview
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35852193
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the stability of a novel biplanar distal humerus plate with the single- and double-columns J-plating techniques.

Materials And Methods: Eighteen sawbones humera were divided into three groups. In Groups 1, 2 and 3, biplanar plate, single lateral J-plate and double J-plate, were used, respectively. Transverse osteotomies at the upper portion of the olecranon fossa were made. Blocks of 10-mm was removed from each sample. Axial, torsional, and extensional stiffness of each group were measured.

Results: The mean axial stiffness values in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 64.80±6.75, 33.70±5.71, and 171.48±9.53 N/mm, respectively. Group 1 demonstrated a statistically significant difference compared to Group 2 (p=0.032), whereas Group 3 showed a statistically significant difference compared to Groups 1 and 2 (p=0.025 and p=0.014, respectively). The mean torsional stiffness values of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 0.23±0.01, 0.14±0.008, and 0.30±0.007 N/ degree, respectively. Groups 1 and 3 demonstrated a statistically significant difference compared to Group 2 (p=0.042 and p=0.028, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected between Groups 1 and 3 (p=0.27). The mean extensional bending stiffness values of Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 2.64±0.31, 1.17±0.13, and 3.2±0.1 N/mm, respectively. Group 1 demonstrated a statistically significant difference compared to Group 2 (p=0.041). There was no statistically significant difference between Groups 1 and 3 (p=0.083).

Conclusion: Biplanar plate allows applying enough numbers of long sagittal screws and offers more biomechanical stability than lateral column J-plate and in some aspects strong as dual J-plating in torsional and bending tests.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Design Optimization of Distal Humerus Fracture Plates: A Review.

Zdero R, Brzozowski P, Schemitsch E Biomed Res Int. 2024; 2024:6015794.

PMID: 38966093 PMC: 11223906. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6015794.


Which parameters are more reliable in proximal humerus surgery in terms of the axillary nerve?.

Onder M, Etli I, Aldemir C Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023; 34(1):190-195.

PMID: 36700282 PMC: 9903127. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.882.

References
1.
Kharbanda Y, Tanwar Y, Srivastava V, Birla V, Rajput A, Pandit R . Retrospective analysis of extra-articular distal humerus shaft fractures treated with the use of pre-contoured lateral column metaphyseal LCP by triceps-sparing posterolateral approach. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016; 12(1):1-9. PMC: 5360669. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-016-0270-6. View

2.
Jacobson S, Glisson R, Urbaniak J . Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997; 6(4):241-9. View

3.
OToole R, Andersen R, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski L, Nascone J . Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(10):709-15. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb. View

4.
Nauth A, McKee M, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch E . Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(7):686-700. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00845. View

5.
Capo J, Debkowska M, Liporace F, Beutel B, Melamed E . Outcomes of distal humerus diaphyseal injuries fixed with a single-column anatomic plate. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(5):1037-43. PMC: 3997763. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2213-x. View