» Articles » PMID: 35852024

Impact of Wine Bottle and Glass Sizes on Wine Consumption at Home: a Within- and Between- Households Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35852024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Reducing alcohol consumption across populations would decrease the risk of a range of diseases, including many cancers, cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes. The aim of the current study was to estimate the impact of using smaller bottles (37.5- versus 75-cl) and glasses (290 versus 370 ml) on consuming wine at home.

Design: Randomized controlled trial of households with cross-over randomization to bottle size and parallel randomization to glass size.

Setting: UK households.

Participants: A total of 260 households consuming at least two 75-cl bottles of wine each week, recruited from the general population through a research agency. The majority consisted of adults who were white and of higher socio-economic position.

Intervention: Households were randomized to the order in which they purchased wine in 37.5- or 75-cl bottles, to consume during two 14-day intervention periods, and further randomized to receive smaller (290 ml) or larger (350 ml) glasses to use during both intervention periods.

Measurements: Volume (ml) of study wine consumed at the end of each 14-day intervention period, measured using photographs of purchased bottles, weighed on study scales.

Findings: Of the randomized households, 217 of 260 (83%) completed the study as per protocol and were included in the primary analysis. There was weak evidence that smaller bottles reduced consumption: after accounting for pre-specified covariates, households consumed on average 145.7 ml (3.6%) less wine when drinking from smaller bottles than from larger bottles [95% confidence intervals (CI) = -335.5 to 43. ml; -8.3 to 1.1%; P = 0.137; Bayes factor (BF) = 2.00]. The evidence for the effect of smaller glasses was stronger: households consumed on average 253.3 ml (6.5%) less wine when drinking from smaller glasses than from larger glasses (95% CI = -517 to 10 ml; -13.2 to 0.3%; P = 0.065; BF = 2.96).

Conclusions: Using smaller glasses to drink wine at home may reduce consumption. Greater uncertainty remains around the possible effect of drinking from smaller bottles.

Citing Articles

Impact on beer sales of removing the pint serving size: An A-B-A reversal trial in pubs, bars, and restaurants in England.

Mantzari E, Hollands G, Law M, Couturier D, Marteau T PLoS Med. 2024; 21(9):e1004442.

PMID: 39288106 PMC: 11407663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004442.


Novel digital-based approach for evaluating wine components' intake: A deep learning model to determine red wine volume in a glass from single-view images.

Cobo M, Relano de la Guia E, Heredia I, Aguilar F, Lloret-Iglesias L, Garcia D Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e35689.

PMID: 39170194 PMC: 11336811. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35689.


Impact on wine sales of removing the largest serving size by the glass: An A-B-A reversal trial in 21 pubs, bars, and restaurants in England.

Mantzari E, Ventsel M, Pechey E, Lee I, Pilling M, Hollands G PLoS Med. 2024; 21(1):e1004313.

PMID: 38236840 PMC: 10796003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004313.


Impact on sales of adding a smaller serving size of beer and cider in licensed premises: an A-B-A reversal design.

Mantzari E, Ventsel M, Pechey E, Lee I, Pilling M, Hollands G BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1239.

PMID: 37365548 PMC: 10294394. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16163-z.


Impact of Sizes of Servings, Glasses and Bottles on Alcohol Consumption: A Narrative Review.

Mantzari E, Marteau T Nutrients. 2022; 14(20).

PMID: 36296928 PMC: 9610830. DOI: 10.3390/nu14204244.


References
1.
Martineau F, Tyner E, Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Lock K . Population-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harm: an overview of systematic reviews. Prev Med. 2013; 57(4):278-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.019. View

2.
. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1345-1422. PMC: 5614451. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8. View

3.
Leong S, Madden C, Gray A, Waters D, Horwath C . Faster self-reported speed of eating is related to higher body mass index in a nationwide survey of middle-aged women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111(8):1192-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.05.012. View

4.
Hollands G, Shemilt I, Marteau T, Jebb S, Lewis H, Wei Y . Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (9):CD011045. PMC: 4579823. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2. View

5.
Hernan M, Robins J . Per-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(14):1391-1398. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsm1605385. View