» Articles » PMID: 35851077

Distal Femoral Osteotomy Versus Lateral Unicompartmental Arthroplasty for Isolated Lateral Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis with Intra-articular and Extra-articular Deformity: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35851077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) represent surgical solutions in cases of valgus malalignment and isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical results, complications, and the overall postoperative alignment of a series of DFO and lateral UKA with a minimum 2-year follow-up in active middle-aged patients.

Methods: Patients with valgus knee and isolated lateral OA who underwent opening-wedge DFO or UKA from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Each patient was characterized by a joint line convergence angle (JLCA) > 3° and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) < 87°. We excluded patients who underwent meniscus or osteochondral allograft during DFO. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), complications, and postoperative alignment were assessed. Propensity score matching was used to identify comparable patients.

Results: The DFO and lateral UKA groups consisted of 29 patients each. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of follow-up, or limb deformity were reported between the two groups. In the DFO group, OKS was reported to improve from 27.51 to 38.59 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 51.14 to 67.2 (p < 0.05). Similarly, in the UKA group, OKS improved from 26.23 to 35.43 (p < 0.05) and KOOS from 50.12 to 65.91 (p < 0.05). However, the improvement in OKS and KOOS (delta) did not differ between groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.95). The DFO and UKA groups were characterized by similar postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle measurements of -3.26 and -3.00, respectively (p = 0.65). No patients in the UKA group underwent revision or other knee surgeries during follow-up. No infections were detected in either group. In the DFO group, no cases of nonunion or delayed union were reported. However, 40% of DFO patients underwent plate removal. One patient in each group was characterized by progression of medial OA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade > 3.

Conclusion: UKA and DFO represent an effective treatment in lateral knee OA with intra-articular and extra-articular deformity. Both surgeries were able to provide a significant and comparable clinical improvement.

Level Of Evidence: III, comparative retrospective cohort study.

Citing Articles

Simoultaneous bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can be performed safely and effectively without bone grafting: analysis of a monocentric retrospective series.

Screpis D, Baldini M, Piovan G, Santamaria F, Iacono V, Gigante A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):1035.

PMID: 39702037 PMC: 11660864. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08022-8.


Comparison of Trends and Complications of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Periarticular Knee Osteotomy Among ABOS Part II Oral Examination Candidates.

Callan K, Smith E, Karasavvidis T, Wang D Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(7):23259671241257818.

PMID: 39100213 PMC: 11295226. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241257818.


Artificial intelligence-based assessment of leg axis parameters shows excellent agreement with human raters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Salzmann M, Hassan Tarek H, Prill R, Becker R, Schreyer A, Hable R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(1):177-190.

PMID: 39033340 PMC: 11716349. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12362.


The Effect of Severe Varus Deformity on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Medial Stabilizing Technique.

Lee S, Jung J, Kim H, Kim J, Jung I, Kim J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541821 PMC: 10971238. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061595.


In closed wedge distal femur osteotomies for correction of valgus malalignment overcorrection of mLDFA should be avoided.

Schroter S, Konrads C, Maiotti M, Mederake M, Fischer C, Ahrend M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(9):3992-3999.

PMID: 37149824 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07449-1.


References
1.
Kosashvili Y, Gross A, Zywiel M, Safir O, Lakstein D, Backstein D . Total knee arthroplasty after failed distal femoral varus osteotomy using selectively stemmed posterior stabilized components. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 26(5):738-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.06.008. View

2.
Ceran Serdar C, Cihan M, Yucel D, Serdar M . Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020; 31(1):010502. PMC: 7745163. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. View

3.
Dewilde T, Dauw J, Vandenneucker H, Bellemans J . Opening wedge distal femoral varus osteotomy using the Puddu plate and calcium phosphate bone cement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(1):249-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2156-6. View

4.
Kennedy J, Mohammad H, Yang I, Mellon S, Dodd C, Pandit H . Oxford domed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(8):1033-1040. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1330.R2. View

5.
Chahla J, Mitchell J, Liechti D, Moatshe G, Menge T, Dean C . Opening- and Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy: A Systematic Review of Outcomes for Isolated Lateral Compartment Osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4(6):2325967116649901. PMC: 4900333. DOI: 10.1177/2325967116649901. View