» Articles » PMID: 35850619

Comparison of Immersive and Non-immersive Virtual Reality Videos As Substitute for In-hospital Teaching During Coronavirus Lockdown: a Survey with Graduate Medical Students in Germany

Overview
Journal Med Educ Online
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Jul 19
PMID 35850619
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a consequence of the continued Covid-19 lockdown in Germany, in-hospital teaching for medical students was impossible. While lectures and other theoretical training were relatively easily converted into online sessions using platforms such as Moodle, Zoom and Microsoft Teams, this was not the case for practical skills and clinical interventions, such as bronchoscopy or colonoscopy. This study describes a workaround that was implemented at the Saarland University Hospital utilizing virtual reality equipment to convey the impressions of shadowing clinical procedures to the students without physical presence. To achieve this, 3D 180° videos of key clinical interventions of various internal medicine specialities were recorded, cut, and censored. The videos were uploaded to the e-learning YouTube channel of our institution and shared with the students via the private share function. The students could choose whether to use a VR-viewer to watch the videos immersively or to watch them without a viewer on a screen non-immersively. At the end of the course after 1 week, the students completed a questionnaire anonymously focusing on learning-success regarding the presented topics, a self-assessment, and an evaluation of the course. A total of 27 students watched the videos with a VR-Viewer and 74 watched non-immersively. Although the VR-viewer group self-assessed their expertise higher, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the learning-success test score. However, students in the VR-viewer group rated the learning atmosphere, comprehensibility, and overall recommendation of the course significantly higher. They also agreed significantly more to the statement, that they gained a better conception of the presented procedures, and that virtual reality might be an appropriate tool for online teaching. Video-assisted teaching facilitates learning and might be a valuable add-on to conventional teaching. Covid-19: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; 3D: three-dimensional; 2D: Two-dimensional; VR: virtual reality.

Citing Articles

Development and user experience of a three-dimensional object-based virtual reality-simulation tool for dental radiography training: a randomized controlled trial.

Im J, Gu J, Bae J, Lee J BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):334.

PMID: 40038644 PMC: 11877882. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06623-4.


Virtual Reality Training to Reduce Workplace Violence in Healthcare.

Clay C, Hochmuth J, Wirth O Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2025; 46(1):2-11.

PMID: 39761223 PMC: 11774209. DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2429712.


Assessing availability and trainees' perceptions of simulation and augmented reality in prosthodontics postgraduate education in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.

Khalid T, Yaqoob H, Syed F, Kazmi S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1541.

PMID: 39731123 PMC: 11681706. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06542-4.


Stepping into the Virtual Realm: Examining the Utility of Non-Immersive VR on Medical Residents' Self-Efficacy, Performance, and Satisfaction.

Gonzalez-Vargas J, Sinz E, Moore J, Miller S Hum Factors Health. 2024; 5.

PMID: 39431120 PMC: 11486498. DOI: 10.1016/j.hfh.2024.100072.


Effects of conventional versus virtual reality-simulated treadmill exercise on fatigue, cognitive function, and participant satisfaction in post-COVID-19 subjects. A randomized trial.

Mahdi Ahmad A, Mohamed Awad Allah S, Abd Elhaseeb G, Elsharawy D, Ahmed H, Mohamed Abdelwahab M J Exerc Sci Fit. 2024; 22(4):316-321.

PMID: 38765321 PMC: 11098941. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2024.04.003.


References
1.
Li L, Yu F, Shi D, Shi J, Tian Z, Yang J . Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine. Am J Transl Res. 2017; 9(9):3867-3880. PMC: 5622235. View

2.
Riva G, Wiederhold B . The New Dawn of Virtual Reality in Health Care: Medical Simulation and Experiential Interface. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016; 219:3-6. View

3.
Birrenbach T, Zbinden J, Papagiannakis G, Exadaktylos A, Muller M, Hautz W . Effectiveness and Utility of Virtual Reality Simulation as an Educational Tool for Safe Performance of COVID-19 Diagnostics: Prospective, Randomized Pilot Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2021; 9(4):e29586. PMC: 8510143. DOI: 10.2196/29586. View

4.
Ventura S, Brivio E, Riva G, Banos R . Immersive Versus Non-immersive Experience: Exploring the Feasibility of Memory Assessment Through 360° Technology. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:2509. PMC: 6868024. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02509. View

5.
Kravitz M, Dadario N, Arif A, Bellido S, Arif A, Ahmed O . The Comparative Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Versus E-Module on the Training of Donning and Doffing Personal Protective Equipment: A Randomized, Simulation-Based Educational Study. Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23655. PMC: 9060736. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23655. View