» Articles » PMID: 35847103

Characterising the Gut Microbiomes in Wild and Captive Short-Beaked Echidnas Reveals Diet-Associated Changes

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Jul 18
PMID 35847103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The gut microbiome plays a vital role in health and wellbeing of animals, and an increasing number of studies are investigating microbiome changes in wild and managed populations to improve conservation and welfare. The short-beaked echidna () is an iconic Australian species, the most widespread native mammal, and commonly held in zoos. Echidnas are cryptic animals, and much is still unknown about many aspects of their biology. Furthermore, some wild echidna populations are under threat, while echidnas held in captivity can have severe gastric health problems. Here, we used citizen science and zoos to collect echidna scats from across Australia to perform the largest gut microbiome study on any native Australian animal. Using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding of scat samples, we characterised and compared the gut microbiomes of echidnas in wild ( = 159) and managed ( = 44) populations, which were fed four different diets. Wild echidna samples were highly variable, yet commonly dominated by soil and plant-fermenting bacteria, while echidnas in captivity were dominated by gut commensals and plant-fermenting bacteria, suggesting plant matter may play a significant role in echidna diet. This work demonstrates significant differences between zoo held and wild echidnas, as well as managed animals on different diets, revealing that diet is important in shaping the gut microbiomes in echidnas. This first analysis of echidna gut microbiome highlights extensive microbial diversity in wild echidnas and changes in microbiome composition in managed populations. This is a first step towards using microbiome analysis to better understand diet, gastrointestinal biology, and improve management in these iconic animals.

Citing Articles

Comparative gut microbiome research through the lens of ecology: theoretical considerations and best practices.

Degregori S, Wang X, Kommala A, Schulhof N, Moradi S, MacDonald A Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):748-763.

PMID: 39530277 PMC: 11885713. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13161.


Exploring the population interaction of Przewalski's gazelle () based on the variations in gut microbiota across diverse geographic populations.

Zhang J, Song P, Jiang F, Zhang T Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1439554.

PMID: 39234536 PMC: 11371741. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1439554.


Pseudogenization of NK3 homeobox 2 () in monotremes provides insight into unique gastric anatomy and physiology.

Dann J, Qu Z, Shearwin-Whyatt L, van der Ploeg R, Grutzner F Open Biol. 2024; 14(7):240071.

PMID: 38955222 PMC: 11285752. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.240071.


Gut microbiota in the short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus Aculeatus) shows stability across gestation.

Buthgamuwa I, Fenelon J, Roser A, Meer H, Johnston S, Dungan A Microbiologyopen. 2023; 12(6):e1392.

PMID: 38129978 PMC: 10721944. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1392.


Community science draws on the power of the crowd.

Dance A Nature. 2022; 609(7927):641-643.

PMID: 36097058 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-02921-3.

References
1.
Shin N, Whon T, Bae J . Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015; 33(9):496-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011. View

2.
Castellarin M, Warren R, Freeman J, Dreolini L, Krzywinski M, Strauss J . Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 2011; 22(2):299-306. PMC: 3266037. DOI: 10.1101/gr.126516.111. View

3.
Chong R, Cheng Y, Hogg C, Belov K . Marsupial Gut Microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:1058. PMC: 7272691. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01058. View

4.
Delsuc F, Metcalf J, Parfrey L, Song S, Gonzalez A, Knight R . Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals. Mol Ecol. 2013; 23(6):1301-1317. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12501. View

5.
Han Y . Fusobacterium nucleatum: a commensal-turned pathogen. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015; 23:141-7. PMC: 4323942. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.013. View