» Articles » PMID: 35835982

A Computational Approach to Quantifying Miscounting of Radiation-induced Double-strand Break Immunofluorescent Foci

Abstract

Immunofluorescent tagging of DNA double-strand break (DSB) markers, such as γ-H2AX and other DSB repair proteins, are powerful tools in understanding biological consequences following irradiation. However, whilst the technique is widespread, there are many uncertainties related to its ability to resolve and reliably deduce the number of foci when counting using microscopy. We present a new tool for simulating radiation-induced foci in order to evaluate microscope performance within in silico immunofluorescent images. Simulations of the DSB distributions were generated using Monte Carlo track-structure simulation. For each DSB distribution, a corresponding DNA repair process was modelled and the un-repaired DSBs were recorded at several time points. Corresponding microscopy images for both a DSB and (γ-H2AX) fluorescent marker were generated and compared for different microscopes, radiation types and doses. Statistically significant differences in miscounting were found across most of the tested scenarios. These inconsistencies were propagated through to repair kinetics where there was a perceived change between radiation-types. These changes did not reflect the underlying repair rate and were caused by inconsistencies in foci counting. We conclude that these underlying uncertainties must be considered when analysing images of DNA damage markers to ensure differences observed are real and are not caused by non-systematic miscounting.

Citing Articles

Early and Late Effects of Low-Dose X-ray Exposure in Human Fibroblasts: DNA Repair Foci, Proliferation, Autophagy, and Senescence.

Osipov A, Chigasova A, Yashkina E, Ignatov M, Vorobyeva N, Zyuzikov N Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(15).

PMID: 39125823 PMC: 11311499. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25158253.


Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in cortisol exposed fibroblasts as quantified with the novel foci-integrated damage complexity score (FIDCS).

Radstake W, Parisi A, Miranda S, Gautam K, Vermeesen R, Rehnberg E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10400.

PMID: 38710823 PMC: 11074260. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60912-y.


High Glucose Increases DNA Damage and Elevates the Expression of Multiple DDR Genes.

Rahmoon M, Elghaish R, Ibrahim A, Alaswad Z, Gad M, El-Khamisy S Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36672885 PMC: 9858638. DOI: 10.3390/genes14010144.

References
1.
Friedland W, Bernhardt P, Jacob P, Paretzke H, Dingfelder M . Simulation of DNA damage after proton and low LET irradiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2002; 99(1-4):99-102. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006848. View

2.
Nakajima N, Brunton H, Watanabe R, Shrikhande A, Hirayama R, Matsufuji N . Visualisation of γH2AX foci caused by heavy ion particle traversal; distinction between core track versus non-track damage. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e70107. PMC: 3743843. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070107. View

3.
Bentzen S, Constine L, Deasy J, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks L . Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3 Suppl):S3-9. PMC: 3431964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040. View

4.
Collins P, Purman C, Porter S, Nganga V, Saini A, Hayer K . DNA double-strand breaks induce H2Ax phosphorylation domains in a contact-dependent manner. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3158. PMC: 7308414. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16926-x. View

5.
Podhorecka M, Skladanowski A, Bozko P . H2AX Phosphorylation: Its Role in DNA Damage Response and Cancer Therapy. J Nucleic Acids. 2010; 2010. PMC: 2929501. DOI: 10.4061/2010/920161. View