» Articles » PMID: 35817765

Impact of Low Versus Negative Estrogen/progesterone Receptor Status on Clinico-pathologic Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in HER2-negative Breast Cancer

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is classically defined by estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) immunohistochemistry expression <1% and absence of HER2 amplification/overexpression. HER2-negative breast cancer with low ER/PR expression (1-10%) has a gene expression profile similar to TNBC; however, real-world treatment patterns, chemotherapy response, endocrine therapy benefit, and survival outcomes for the Low-ER group are not well known. 516 patients with stage I-III HER2-negative breast cancer and ER/PR expression ≤10% who were enrolled in a multisite prospective registry between 2011 and 2019 were categorized on the basis of ER/PR expression. TNBC (ER and PR < 1%) and Low-ER (ER and/or PR 1-10%) groups comprised 87.4% (n = 451) and 12.6% (n = 65) of patients, respectively. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics, including prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutation, racial and ethnic distribution, and chemotherapy use were not different between TNBC and Low-ER groups. No difference was observed in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between TNBC and Low-ER groups (3-year RFS 82.5% versus 82.4%, respectively, p = 0.728; 3-year OS 88.0% versus 83.4%, respectively, p = 0.632). Among 358 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rates of pathologic complete response were similar for TNBC and Low-ER groups (49.2% vs 51.3%, respectively, p = 0.808). The HER2-negative Low-ER group is often excluded from TNBC clinical trials assessing novel treatments (immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates), thus limiting efficacy data for newer effective therapies in this group. Given that HER2-negative Low-ER disease displays clinical characteristics and outcomes similar to TNBC, inclusion of this group in TNBC clinical trials is encouraged.

Citing Articles

TROPION-Breast04: a randomized phase III study of neoadjuvant datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) plus durvalumab followed by adjuvant durvalumab versus standard of care in patients with treatment-naïve early-stage triple negative or HR-low/HER2-....

McArthur H, Tolaney S, Dent R, Schmid P, Asselah J, Liu Q Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359251316176.

PMID: 39917260 PMC: 11800260. DOI: 10.1177/17588359251316176.


Accessible model predicts response in hormone receptor positive HER2 negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Mastrantoni L, Garufi G, Giordano G, Maliziola N, Di Monte E, Arcuri G NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025; 11(1):11.

PMID: 39910103 PMC: 11799161. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-025-00727-w.


Immunotherapy boosts responses in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers.

Mitri Z, Gelmon K Nat Med. 2025; 31(2):382-383.

PMID: 39901048 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03441-5.


Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in high-risk, early-stage, ER/HER2 breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Cardoso F, OShaughnessy J, Liu Z, McArthur H, Schmid P, Cortes J Nat Med. 2025; 31(2):442-448.

PMID: 39838117 PMC: 11835712. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03415-7.


Subtype-specific prognostic impact of Bcl-2 in HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer.

Kim T, Lim S, Choi H, Cho I, Noh H, Lee J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):920.

PMID: 39762296 PMC: 11704137. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83302-w.


References
1.
Harvey J, Clark G, Osborne C, Allred D . Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(5):1474-81. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1474. View

2.
Hudis C, Barlow W, Costantino J, Gray R, Pritchard K, Chapman J . Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(15):2127-32. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3523. View

3.
Bardia A, Tolaney S, Punie K, Loirat D, Oliveira M, Kalinsky K . Biomarker analyses in the phase III ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021; 32(9):1148-1156. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.002. View

4.
Coates A, Winer E, Goldhirsch A, Gelber R, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M . Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(8):1533-46. PMC: 4511219. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. View

5.
Cortes J, Cescon D, Rugo H, Nowecki Z, Im S, Yusof M . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020; 396(10265):1817-1828. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9. View