» Articles » PMID: 35810315

Quality of Life Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties for Use in Parents During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: a Systematic Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35810315
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To identify instruments used to measure parents' Quality of Life (QoL) during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and to describe their characteristics and psychometric properties.

Methods: For this scoping review we conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and HaPI in mid-December 2020, to identify studies evaluating psychometric properties. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) were used to define and categorize psychometric properties. Two reviewers screened the studies independently, and customized screening questions were used to assess eligibility against inclusion criteria. Data were systematically extracted into a predesigned data charting matrix, and descriptively analyzed.

Results: The searches identified 5671 studies, of which 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 19 QoL instruments: 12 generic and seven period specific. The most reported instruments were SF-36, SF-12 and WHOQOL-BREF, and the most evaluated instruments were SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, QOL-GRAV, and PQOL. We found that none of the identified instruments had been evaluated for all nine psychometric properties recommended by the COSMIN. The most reported psychometric properties were internal consistency and structural validity. The instruments were primarily assessed in parents residing in Asia (50%), and 83% of the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2020. Only three studies included psychometric measures assessed on fathers.

Conclusion: Our review shows there is extensive evidence on the internal consistency and structural validity of QoL instruments used on parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period, but that the evidence on other psychometric properties is sparse. Validation studies and primary studies are needed to provide evidence on the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of QoL instruments for this target group, in particular for fathers and partners.

Citing Articles

Psychometric analysis and validation of the SF-34 PREG: An adaptation of the SF-36 for assessing quality of life in pregnant women.

Martin-Vazquez C, Urchaga-Litago J, Garcia-Fernandez R, Calvo-Ayuso N, Roson-Matilla L, Liebana-Presa C Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 168(2):743-752.

PMID: 39258468 PMC: 11726142. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15904.


How the structural determinants of health inequities impact access to prescription medication for pregnant women in Australia: a narrative review.

Jackson H, Grzeskowiak L, Enticott J, Wise S, Callander E Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024; 42:100934.

PMID: 38357390 PMC: 10865029. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100934.


Postpartum quality of life and mental health in women with heart disease: Integrated clinical communication and treatment.

Liu J, Wang Q, Qu D World J Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):63-75.

PMID: 38327887 PMC: 10845230. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i1.63.


Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a digital questionnaire for the self-management of health and well-being in the postpartum period.

Bully P, Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Garcia-Alvarez A, Espinosa M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):610.

PMID: 37626320 PMC: 10463739. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05899-6.


Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population.

Rondung E, Oliveira S, Esteves F Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023; 21(1):96.

PMID: 37605225 PMC: 10441688. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02166-2.


References
1.
Hunt S, McEwen J . The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn. 1980; 2(3):231-46. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340686. View

2.
Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D . PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. View

3.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A . Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016; 5(1):210. PMC: 5139140. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. View

4.
Akyn B, Ege E, Kocodlu D, Demiroren N, Yylmaz S . Quality of life and related factors in women, aged 15-49 in the 12-month post-partum period in Turkey. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009; 35(1):86-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00870.x. View

5.
Chen Y, Huang J, Au H, Chen Y . High risk of depression, anxiety, and poor quality of life among experienced fathers, but not mothers: A prospective longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2018; 242:39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.042. View