» Articles » PMID: 35805540

Informal Employment and Poor Mental Health in a Sample of 180,260 Workers from 13 Iberoamerican Countries

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35805540
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study is to estimate the association between employment conditions and mental health status in the working population of Iberoamerica. In this cross-sectional study, we pooled individual-level data from nationally representative surveys across 13 countries. A sample of 180,260 workers was analyzed. Informality was assessed by social security, health affiliation, or contract holding. Mental health was assessed using several instruments. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the contribution of informality to poor mental health by sex and country, adjusted by sociodemographic and work-related characteristics. Then, we performed a meta-analysis pooling of aggregate data using a random-effects inverse-variance model. Workers in informal employments showed a higher adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of poor mental health than those in formal employment in Peru (aPR men 1.5 [95% confidence intervals 1.16; 1.93]), Spain (aPR men 2.2 [1.01; 4.78]) and Mexico (aPR men 1.24 [1.04; 1.47]; women 1.39 [1.18; 1.64]). Overall estimates showed that workers in informal employment have a higher prevalence of poor mental health than formal workers, with it being 1.19 times higher (aPR 1.19 [1.02; 1.39]) among men, and 1.11 times higher prevalence among women (aPR 1.11 [1.00; 1.23]). Addressing informal employment could contribute to improving workers' mental health.

Citing Articles

A two-pronged approach to understanding reciprocity and mental health relationship in developing countries: evidence from young informal construction workers in Nigeria.

Oladosu A, Chanimbe T BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1851.

PMID: 38992669 PMC: 11238371. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19315-x.

References
1.
Mergl R, Seidscheck I, Allgaier A, Moller H, Hegerl U, Henkel V . Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: prevalence and recognition. Depress Anxiety. 2006; 24(3):185-95. DOI: 10.1002/da.20192. View

2.
Paterniti S, Niedhammer I, Lang T, Consoli S . Psychosocial factors at work, personality traits and depressive symptoms. Longitudinal results from the GAZEL Study. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 181:111-7. View

3.
Friedland D, Price R . Underemployment: consequences for the health and well-being of workers. Am J Community Psychol. 2003; 32(1-2):33-45. DOI: 10.1023/a:1025638705649. View

4.
Munoz R, McBride M, Brnabic A, Lopez C, Hetem L, Secin R . Major depressive disorder in Latin America: the relationship between depression severity, painful somatic symptoms, and quality of life. J Affect Disord. 2005; 86(1):93-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.12.012. View

5.
Stansfeld S, Fuhrer R, Shipley M, Marmot M . Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med. 1999; 56(5):302-7. PMC: 1757742. DOI: 10.1136/oem.56.5.302. View