» Articles » PMID: 32887576

Predictors of Mental Health Problems in Formal and Informal Caregivers of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2020 Sep 5
PMID 32887576
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Caring for a person with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with significant mental burden e.g., depression and anxiety, and difficulties with social, familial, and professional functioning. To date, few studies have examined variables which would allow for a comprehensive and detailed study of the relationship between personal resources and caregiver health status, with a majority of studies focusing on factors that contribute to increased caregiver's burden. Moreover, the available evidence fails to address differences in the functioning of formal and informal carers. Paying proper attention to the problems of nursing home staff can help identify important risk factors. Therefore, this study compared mental health problems in informal and formal caregivers and examined the relationship between mental resources and mental health problems in both groups of caregivers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 100 formal (n = 50) and informal (n = 50) caregivers of AD patients. Personal resources were measured with the Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ), the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Sense of Coherence Questionnaire (SCQ), while mental health was assessed with the Depression Assessment Questionnaire (DAQ) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Multivariate stepwise regression was performed separately for both investigated groups.

Results: There were no significant differences between informal and formal caregivers in terms of psychological variables, i.e., sense of coherence, social support, self-efficacy, or mental health problems. In contrast, there were different significant predictors of mental health problems in both groups. Comprehensibility (SCQ) was a significant predictor of mental health problems measured by DAQ and self-efficacy (GSES) was a significant predictor of mental health problems measured by GHQ in informal caregivers. For formal caregivers, emotional support (SSQ) and comprehensibility (SCQ) were significant predictors of mental health problems measured by DAQ, while tangible support (SSQ) and meaningfulness (SCQ) were significant predictors of mental health problems measured by GHQ.

Conclusions: Personal resources are significant predictors of mental health outcomes in caregivers of AD patients. Preventive actions should therefore include assessment of factors affecting caregivers' mental health in order to provide them with necessary care and create appropriate support groups.

Citing Articles

Caregivers' Experience of Supporting Deaf Adults with Mental Health Disorders in Ghana.

Mprah W, Opoku M, Gyimah E, Nur S, Duorinaah J, Frimpomaa L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).

PMID: 40003370 PMC: 11855379. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020144.


Compassion as the cornerstone of palliative nursing care for patients with heart failure: a phenomenological study.

Akbarian-Rokni M, Abbasi M, Pezaro S, Mardani-Hamooleh M BMC Res Notes. 2025; 18(1):81.

PMID: 39994773 PMC: 11849183. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-025-07158-7.


Factors influencing the employed caregiver burden for patients with dementia residing in nursing homes: A cross-sectional study from China.

Liu C, Zheng H, Li B, He S, Hu R, Li F Int J Nurs Sci. 2025; 11(4):457-464.

PMID: 39830912 PMC: 11740308. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.08.005.


Experiences of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia family caregivers on Reddit communities: A topic modeling and sentiment analysis.

Hswen Y, Xiong J, Hurley M, Nguyen T Artif Intell Health. 2024; 1(3):127-135.

PMID: 39246419 PMC: 11378727. DOI: 10.36922/aih.3075.


Emotional Coping Strategies for Informal Caregivers of Hospitalized Patients: A Study of Distress and Overload.

Oleas Rodriguez D, Yong Pena C, Garza Olivares X, Teixeira Filho F, Lucero Cordova J, Salas Naranjo A Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:725-734.

PMID: 38410381 PMC: 10895987. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S443200.


References
1.
Bandura A, Taylor C, Williams S, Mefford I, Barchas J . Catecholamine secretion as a function of perceived coping self-efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985; 53(3):406-14. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.3.406. View

2.
Eriksson M, Lindstrom B, Lilja J . A sense of coherence and health. Salutogenesis in a societal context: Aland, a special case?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007; 61(8):684-8. PMC: 2652992. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.047498. View

3.
Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R . The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol. 2005; 139(5):439-57. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457. View

4.
Berkman L, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T . From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(6):843-57. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4. View

5.
Kreitler S, Peleg D, Ehrenfeld M . Stress, self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2006; 16(4):329-41. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1063. View