» Articles » PMID: 35804702

You Eat How You Think: A Review on the Impact of Cognitive Styles on Food Perception and Behavior

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Jul 9
PMID 35804702
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensory perception is understood to be a complex area of research that requires investigations from a variety of different perspectives. Although researchers have tried to better understand consumers' perception of food, one area that has been minimally explored is how psychological cognitive theories can help them explain consumer perceptions, behaviors, and decisions in food-related experiences. The concept of cognitive styles has existed for nearly a century, with the majority of cognitive style theories existing along a continuum with two bookends. Some of the more common theories such as individualist-collectivist, left-brain-right-brain, and convergent-divergent theories each offered their own unique insight into better understanding consumer behavior. However, these theories often focused only on niche applications or on specific aspects of cognition. More recently, the analytic-holistic cognitive style theory was developed to encompass many of these prior theoretical components and apply them to more general cognitive tendencies of individuals. Through applying the analytic-holistic theory and focusing on modern cultural psychology work, this review may allow researchers to be able to answer one of the paramount questions of sensory and consumer sciences: how and why do consumers perceive and respond to food stimuli the way that they do?

Citing Articles

Analytic-holistic cognitive styles affect consumer responses to food and beverage samples during sensory evaluation.

Beekman T, Seo H Curr Res Food Sci. 2024; 8:100635.

PMID: 38623275 PMC: 11016584. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100635.


Green-Labelled Rice versus Conventional Rice: Perception and Emotion of Chinese Consumers Based on Review Mining.

Xu H, Xiao M, Zeng J, Hao H Foods. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36613303 PMC: 9818160. DOI: 10.3390/foods12010087.

References
1.
Na J, Huang C, Park D . When Age and Culture Interact in an Easy and Yet Cognitively Demanding Task: Older Adults, But Not Younger Adults, Showed the Expected Cultural Differences. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:457. PMC: 5366355. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00457. View

2.
Spencer-Rodgers J, Williams M, Peng K . Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: a decade of empirical research. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010; 14(3):296-312. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310362982. View

3.
Spence C . What is the link between personality and food behavior?. Curr Res Food Sci. 2021; 5:19-27. PMC: 8666606. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.001. View

4.
Follmann R, Goldsmith C, Stein W . Multimodal sensory information is represented by a combinatorial code in a sensorimotor system. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(10):e2004527. PMC: 6201955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004527. View

5.
De Vaus J, Hornsey M, Kuppens P, Bastian B . Exploring the East-West Divide in Prevalence of Affective Disorder: A Case for Cultural Differences in Coping With Negative Emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017; 22(3):285-304. DOI: 10.1177/1088868317736222. View