» Articles » PMID: 35794408

Development of Visual Sustained Selective Attention and Response Inhibition in Deaf Children

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jul 6
PMID 35794408
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies of deaf and hard-of-hearing (henceforth, deaf) children tend to make comparisons with typically hearing children for the purpose of either identifying deficits to be remediated or understanding the impact of auditory deprivation on visual or domain general processing. Here, we eschew these clinical and theoretical aims, seeking instead to understand factors that explain variability in cognitive function within deaf children. A total of 108 bilingual deaf children ages 7-13 years who use both English and American Sign Language (ASL) participated in a longitudinal study of executive function (EF) development. We report longitudinal data from a visual continuous performance task that measured sustained selective attention and response inhibition. Results show that the impact of deafness on these processes is negligible, but that language skills have a positive relationship with both: better English abilities were associated with better selective sustained attention, and better ASL abilities with better response inhibition. The relationship between sustained selective attention and English abilities may reflect the cognitive demands of spoken language acquisition for deaf children, whereas better ASL abilities may promote an "inner voice," associated with improved response inhibition. The current study cannot conclusively demonstrate causality or directionality of effects. However, these data highlight the importance of studies that focus on atypical individuals, for whom the relationships between language and cognition may be different from those observed in typically developing populations.

Citing Articles

Neurocognitive outcomes in young adults with cochlear implants: The role of early language access and crossmodal plasticity.

Kartheiser G, Cormier K, Bell-Souder D, Dye M, Sharma A Hear Res. 2024; 451:109074.

PMID: 39018768 PMC: 11878232. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109074.


Research of visual attention networks in deaf individuals: a systematic review.

Gioiosa Maurno N, Phillips-Silver J, Daza Gonzalez M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1369941.

PMID: 38800679 PMC: 11120974. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369941.


Cognition Assessment Technologies on Deaf People.

Guerrero-Arenas C, Osornio-Garcia F J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):18.

PMID: 36910582 PMC: 10000328. DOI: 10.5334/joc.262.

References
1.
Allen T, Morere D . Early visual language skills affect the trajectory of literacy gains over a three-year period of time for preschool aged deaf children who experience signing in the home. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0229591. PMC: 7046216. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229591. View

2.
Altshuler K . Studies of the deaf: relevance to psychiatric theory. Am J Psychiatry. 1971; 127(11):1521-6. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.127.11.1521. View

3.
N Andrew K, Hoshooley J, Joanisse M . Sign language ability in young deaf signers predicts comprehension of written sentences in English. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89994. PMC: 3938551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089994. View

4.
Bavelier D, Neville H . Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(6):443-52. DOI: 10.1038/nrn848. View

5.
Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomann A, Mitchell T, Neville H, Liu G . Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. J Neurosci. 2001; 21(22):8931-42. PMC: 6762265. View