» Articles » PMID: 35784622

Clinical Adverse Events and Device Failures for the Barrx™ Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter System: a MAUDE Database Analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35784622
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Barrx™ radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter system comes in several different variations and sizes and is widely used for the eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The Barrx™ 360 and 360 Express system is used to perform circumferential RFA, while the Barrx™ focal catheter system is used for secondary focal RFA or primary treatment of short-segment BE. We aimed to investigate the number and type of complications and device failures associated with the Barrx™ RFA catheter system.

Method: We analyzed post-marketing surveillance data from the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from August 2011 to August 2021.

Results: During the study period, 148 unique reports detailing 78 device issues and 87 patient-related adverse events were identified. The most reported adverse events for patients were stenosis secondary to treatment (n=15, 17.24%), mucosal laceration of the esophagus (n=13, 14.94%), chest pain (n=10, 11.49%), and odynophagia/dysphagia (n=7, 8.05%). The most common device complication was failure of the device to deploy when activated (n=10, 13.82%). Other device malfunctions included material deformation/distortion (n=7, 8.97%), catheter breakage (n=6, 7.69%), connection problems between the generator cable and RFA device (n=6, 7.69%), and failure of the balloon to properly inflate (n=5, 6.41%).

Conclusion: Findings from the MAUDE database highlight patient and device complications that endoscopists should be aware of prior to RFA of BE with the Barrx™ RFA catheter system.

Citing Articles

Local hyperthermia mediated by gold nanoparticle-integrated silicone-covered stent: feasibility and tissue response in a rat esophageal model.

Tsauo J, Liu Y, Zhang X, Fu Y, Zhao H, Gong T Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):40.

PMID: 38565836 PMC: 10987532. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00438-0.


Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data.

Li X, Feng Y, Gong Y, Chen Y J Patient Saf. 2024; 20(5):e45-e58.

PMID: 38470959 PMC: 11636620. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001220.


Endoscopic Management of Dysplastic Barrett's Oesophagus and Early Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Eusebi L, Telese A, Castellana C, Engin R, Norton B, Papaefthymiou A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37835470 PMC: 10571849. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194776.


Atrial Flutter After Radiofrequency Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus: A Case Report.

Fassari A, De Blasi V, Basile M, Perretta S Am J Case Rep. 2023; 24:e941264.

PMID: 37794654 PMC: 10565709. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.941264.

References
1.
Sullivan R, Mulki R, Peter S . The role of ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 14:26317745211049967. PMC: 8544766. DOI: 10.1177/26317745211049967. View

2.
Belghazi K, Pouw R, Sondermeijer C, Meijer S, Schoon E, Koch A . A single-step sizing and radiofrequency ablation catheter for circumferential ablation of Barrett's esophagus: Results of a pilot study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018; 6(7):990-999. PMC: 6137598. DOI: 10.1177/2050640618768919. View

3.
Orman E, Li N, Shaheen N . Efficacy and durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's Esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11(10):1245-55. PMC: 3870150. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.039. View

4.
Shaheen N, Falk G, Iyer P, Gerson L . ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 111(1):30-50. PMC: 10245082. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322. View

5.
Pouw R, Klaver E, Phoa K, van Vilsteren F, Weusten B, Bisschops R . Radiofrequency ablation for low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: long-term outcome of a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92(3):569-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3756. View