» Articles » PMID: 35782011

Assessing Ex Situ Genetic and Ecogeographic Conservation in a Threatened but Widespread Oak After Range-wide Collecting Effort

Overview
Journal Evol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jul 5
PMID 35782011
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the genetic diversity and structure of in situ populations has been investigated in thousands of studies, the genetic composition of ex situ plant populations has rarely been studied. A better understanding of how much genetic diversity is conserved ex situ, how it is distributed among locations (e.g., botanic gardens), and what minimum sample sizes are needed is necessary to improve conservation outcomes. Here we address these issues in a threatened desert oak species, Rydb. We assess the genetic, geographic, and ecological representation of 290 plants from eight ex situ locations, relative to 667 wild individuals from 35 in situ locations. We also leverage a recent dataset of >3000 samples from 11 other threatened plants to directly compare the degree of genetic conservation for species that differ in geographic range size. We found that a majority of .  genetic diversity is conserved; one of its geographic regions is significantly better conserved than the other; genetic diversity conservation of this widespread species is lower than documented for the 11 rarer taxa; genetic diversity within each garden is strongly correlated to the number of plants and number of source populations; and measures of geographic and ecological conservation (i.e., percent area and percent of ecoregions represented) were typically lower than the direct assessment of genetic diversity (i.e., percent alleles). This information will inform future seed sampling expeditions to ensure that the intraspecific diversity of threatened plants can be effectively conserved.

Citing Articles

Simulating pollen flow and field sampling constraints helps revise seed sampling recommendations for conserving genetic diversity.

Rosenberger K, Hoban S Appl Plant Sci. 2024; 12(3):e11561.

PMID: 38912130 PMC: 11192154. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11561.


Ex situ conservation of two rare oak species using microsatellite and SNP markers.

Koontz A, Schumacher E, Spence E, Hoban S Evol Appl. 2024; 17(3):e13650.

PMID: 38524684 PMC: 10960078. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13650.


Biodiversity protection against anthropogenic climate change: Conservation prioritization of in the South Caucasus based on genetic and ecological metrics.

Beridze B, Sekiewicz K, Walas L, Thomas P, Danelia I, Fazaliyev V Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(5):e10068.

PMID: 37214605 PMC: 10196223. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10068.


Assessing ex situ genetic and ecogeographic conservation in a threatened but widespread oak after range-wide collecting effort.

Zumwalde B, Fredlock B, Bruns E, Duckett D, McCauley R, Spence E Evol Appl. 2022; 15(6):1002-1017.

PMID: 35782011 PMC: 9234636. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13391.

References
1.
Borrell J, Zohren J, Nichols R, Buggs R . Genomic assessment of local adaptation in dwarf birch to inform assisted gene flow. Evol Appl. 2020; 13(1):161-175. PMC: 6935589. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12883. View

2.
Ramos A, Usie A, Barbosa P, Barros P, Capote T, Chaves I . The draft genome sequence of cork oak. Sci Data. 2018; 5:180069. PMC: 5963338. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.69. View

3.
Ramirez-Villegas J, Khoury C, Jarvis A, Debouck D, Guarino L . A gap analysis methodology for collecting crop genepools: a case study with phaseolus beans. PLoS One. 2010; 5(10):e13497. PMC: 2958131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013497. View

4.
Plomion C, Martin F . Oak genomics is proving its worth. New Phytol. 2020; 226(4):943-946. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16560. View

5.
Kamvar Z, Tabima J, Grunwald N . Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e281. PMC: 3961149. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.281. View