» Articles » PMID: 35769150

Coating of Intestinal Anastomoses for Prevention of Postoperative Leakage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Jun 30
PMID 35769150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For several decades, scientific efforts have been taken to develop strategies and medical aids for the reduction of anastomotic complications after intestinal surgery. Still, anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a frequently occurring postoperative complication with serious consequences on health, quality of life, and economic aspects. Approaches using collagen and/or fibrin-based sealants to cover intestinal anastomoses have shown promising effects toward leak reduction; however, they have not reached routine use yet. To assess the effects of covering intestinal anastomoses with collagen and/or fibrin-based sealants on postoperative leakage, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.

Method: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus (01/01/1964 to 17/01/2022) were searched to identify studies investigating the effects of coating any intestinal anastomoses with collagen and/or fibrin-based sealants on postoperative AL, reoperation rates, Clavien-Dindo major complication, mortality, and hospitalization length. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Overall, 15 studies (five randomized controlled trials, three nonrandomized intervention studies, six observational cohort studies) examining 1,387 patients in the intervention group and 2,243 in the control group were included. Using fixed-effects meta-analysis (  < 50%), patients with coated intestinal anastomoses presented significantly lower AL rates (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.27-0.52; < 0.00001), reoperation rates (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.47; = 0.0001), and Clavien-Dindo major complication rates (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.84; = 0.006) in comparison to controls, with results remaining stable in sensitivity and subgroup analyses (stratified by study design, age group, intervention used, location of anastomoses, and indication for surgery). The length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the intervention group (weighted mean difference (WMD), -1.96; 95% CI, -3.21, -0.71; = 0.002) using random-effects meta-analysis ( ≥ 50%), especially for patients with surgery of upper gastrointestinal malignancy (WMD, -4.94; 95% CI, -7.98, -1.90; = 0.001).

Conclusion: The application of collagen-based laminar biomaterials or fibrin sealants on intestinal anastomoses can significantly reduce postoperative rates of AL and its sequelae. Coating of intestinal anastomoses could be a step toward effective and sustainable leak prevention. To assess the validity and robustness of these findings, further clinical studies need to be conducted.

Citing Articles

Fibrin glue and coats compromise the integrity of colonic anastomosis: an experimental trial on rats.

Voloudakis N, Koutelidakis I, Christoforidis E, Atmatzidis S, Kotoreni G, Papaziogas B Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(2):216-224.

PMID: 38481780 PMC: 10927628. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0859.


The role of tissue adhesives and sealants in colorectal anastomotic healing-a scoping review.

Valsamidis T, Rasmussen T, Eriksen J, Iversen L Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):265.

PMID: 37935974 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04554-y.


Biologically inspired gastrointestinal stapler design: "Getting to Zero" complications.

Alverdy J Am J Surg. 2023; 226(1):48-52.

PMID: 36775790 PMC: 10293041. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.030.

References
1.
Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P . Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(5):890-9. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929. View

2.
Kim H, Huh J, Kim H, Kim Y . Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery according to the use of fibrin glue: case-control study using propensity score matching method. Am J Surg. 2013; 207(6):840-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.047. View

3.
Kang C, Halabi W, Chaudhry O, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael J . Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg. 2012; 148(1):65-71. DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2. View

4.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

5.
Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View