» Articles » PMID: 19089661

Outcome of Rectal Cancer Surgery After the Introduction of Preoperative Radiotherapy in a Low-volume Hospital

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2008 Dec 18
PMID 19089661
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The improvement in local control by preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer can be at the cost of substantial morbidity.

Aim Of The Study: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of short-course preoperative radiotherapy on morbidity and mortality after total mesorectal excision in a low-volume hospital.

Methods: From 2000 to 2007, 104 patients underwent rectal resection for a proven malignancy. Outcome parameters including anastomotic leakage rate, duration of hospital stay, and survival were retrospectively compared between patients who received radiotherapy followed by resection and patients who underwent resection alone.

Results: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 11 of 28 patients (39%) who underwent radiotherapy and in 10 of 54 patients (19%) in the surgery-alone group (P = 0.04). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the radiotherapy group in comparison with the surgery-alone group (median 22 vs. 12 days; P = 0.002). Independent predictors of decreased overall survival were high American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, application of preoperative radiotherapy, necessity of Intensive Care Unit admission, and advanced pathological stage.

Conclusions: A negative impact of preoperative radiotherapy on morbidity and mortality after rectal cancer surgery with an annual caseload of 16 was observed. Auditing of local practices is essential for quality control and potential improvement of clinical outcome.

Citing Articles

The mesenteric entry site as a potential weak point in gastrointestinal anastomoses - findings from an ex-vivo biomechanical analysis.

Cira K, Janett S, Micheler C, Heller S, Obermeier A, Friess H Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):124.

PMID: 38615148 PMC: 11016002. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03318-8.


Coating of Intestinal Anastomoses for Prevention of Postoperative Leakage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cira K, Stocker F, Reischl S, Obermeier A, Friess H, Burgkart R Front Surg. 2022; 9:882173.

PMID: 35769150 PMC: 9235828. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.882173.


Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Postoperative Complications in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Yang J, Luo Y, Tian T, Dong P, Fu Z J Oncol. 2022; 2022:8197701.

PMID: 35035483 PMC: 8754670. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8197701.


The effect of the introduction of the ERAS protocol in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Huibers C, de Roos M, Ong K Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011; 27(6):751-7.

PMID: 22173714 PMC: 3359461. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1385-3.

References
1.
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R . Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2004; 6(6):462-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x. View

2.
Schrag D, Panageas K, Riedel E, Cramer L, Guillem J, Bach P . Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2002; 236(5):583-92. PMC: 1422616. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200211000-00008. View

3.
Harmon J, Tang D, Gordon T, BOWMAN H, Choti M, KAUFMAN H . Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 1999; 230(3):404-11; discussion 411-3. PMC: 1420885. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00013. View

4.
Borowski D, Kelly S, Bradburn D, Wilson R, Gunn A, Ratcliffe A . Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2007; 94(7):880-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5721. View

5.
Glimelius B, Isacsson U . Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer--is 5 x 5 Gy a good or a bad schedule?. Acta Oncol. 2002; 40(8):958-67. DOI: 10.1080/02841860152708242. View