» Articles » PMID: 35765810

Cross-modal Facilitation of Auditory Discrimination in a Frog

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 29
PMID 35765810
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stimulation in one sensory modality can affect perception in a separate modality, resulting in diverse effects including illusions in humans. This can also result in cross-modal facilitation, a process where sensory performance in one modality is improved by stimulation in another modality. For instance, a simple sound can improve performance in a visual task in both humans and cats. However, the range of contexts and underlying mechanisms that evoke such facilitation effects remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrated cross-modal stimulation in wild-caught túngara frogs, a species with well-studied acoustic preferences in females. We first identified that a combined visual and seismic cue (vocal sac movement and water ripple) was behaviourally relevant for females choosing between two courtship calls in a phonotaxis assay. We then found that this combined cross-modal stimulus rescued a species-typical acoustic preference in the presence of background noise that otherwise abolished the preference. These results highlight how cross-modal stimulation can prime attention in receivers to improve performance during decision-making. With this, we provide the foundation for future work uncovering the processes and conditions that promote cross-modal facilitation effects.

Citing Articles

Response to comment on 'Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs'.

Zhao L, Halfwerk W, Cui J Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37812200 PMC: 10561973. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.90404.


Cross-modal facilitation of auditory discrimination in a frog.

James L, Baier A, Page R, Clements P, Hunter K, Taylor R Biol Lett. 2022; 18(6):20220098.

PMID: 35765810 PMC: 9240679. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0098.

References
1.
Wilczyniski W, Northcutt R . Afferents to the optic tectum of the leopard frog: an HRP study. J Comp Neurol. 1977; 173(2):219-30. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901730202. View

2.
Stein B, Stanford T, Rowland B . The neural basis of multisensory integration in the midbrain: its organization and maturation. Hear Res. 2009; 258(1-2):4-15. PMC: 2787841. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.03.012. View

3.
Taylor R, Klein B, Stein J, Ryan M . Multimodal signal variation in space and time: how important is matching a signal with its signaler?. J Exp Biol. 2011; 214(Pt 5):815-20. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.043638. View

4.
Starnberger I, Preininger D, Hodl W . The anuran vocal sac: a tool for multimodal signalling. Anim Behav. 2014; 97:281-288. PMC: 4222773. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.07.027. View

5.
Stein B, Meredith M, Huneycutt W, McDade L . Behavioral Indices of Multisensory Integration: Orientation to Visual Cues is Affected by Auditory Stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 1(1):12-24. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.1.12. View