» Articles » PMID: 35756751

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Trends in Cardiothoracic Imaging

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35756751
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Here, we evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of cardiothoracic imaging studies.

Methods: We queried our radiology record system to retrospectively identify numbers of specific key cardiothoracic imaging studies for five years prior and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate changes in the number of exams in 2020 and 2021 compared to 2019.

Results: Five-year retrospective analysis demonstrated progressive increases in nearly all cross-sectional studies. In 2020, daily chest radiograph utilization decreased with an overall number of daily radiographs of 406 (SD = 73.1) compared to 480 per day in 2019 (SD = 82.6) ( < 0.0001). Portable radiograph utilization was increased in 2020 averaging 320 (SD = 68.2) films daily in 2020 compared to 266 (SD = 29.1) in 2019 ( < 0.0001). Utilization of thoracic CT was decreased during the pandemic, with 21.8 (SD = 12.9) studies daily compared to 52.0 (SD = 21.4) ( < 0.0001) studies daily in 2019. Cardiac imaging utilization was also substantially decreased in 2020 compared to 2019, averaging a total of 3.8 (SD = 3.2) versus 10.8 (SD = 6.6) studies daily and 0.88 (SD = 1.7) versus 2.5 (SD = 2.3) studies daily for CT and MRI, respectively. Evaluation of cardiothoracic imaging for the subsequent 18 months after New York's entry to phase I recovery in June 2020 demonstrated that by one year after the emergence of COVID-19 imaging utilization had recovered to prepandemic levels. Cardiac imaging continued to increase throughout the chronic phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, reaching almost twice the prepandemic levels by the end of 2021.

Conclusion: COVID-19 has had far-reaching effects on medicine and public health. Here, we demonstrate decreases in all cross-sectional cardiothoracic imaging studies, closely mirroring findings in other fields during the height of the pandemic, which have since rebounded.

References
1.
Odedra D, Chahal B, Patlas M . Impact of COVID-19 on Canadian Radiology Residency Training Programs. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020; 71(4):482-489. PMC: 7290107. DOI: 10.1177/0846537120933215. View

2.
Metzler B, Siostrzonek P, Binder R, Bauer A, Reinstadler S . Decline of acute coronary syndrome admissions in Austria since the outbreak of COVID-19: the pandemic response causes cardiac collateral damage. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(19):1852-1853. PMC: 7184486. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa314. View

3.
Rubinowitz A, Siegel M, Tocino I . Thoracic imaging in the ICU. Crit Care Clin. 2007; 23(3):539-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.06.001. View

4.
Vasarmidi E, Tsitoura E, Spandidos D, Tzanakis N, Antoniou K . Pulmonary fibrosis in the aftermath of the COVID-19 era (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2020; 20(3):2557-2560. PMC: 7401793. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8980. View

5.
Rubin G, Leipsic J, Schoepf U, Fleischmann D, Napel S . CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance. Radiology. 2014; 271(3):633-52. PMC: 4669887. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132232. View