Radiation Dose Reduction with Increasing Utilization of Prospective Gating in 64-multidetector Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography
Overview
Radiology
Affiliations
Background: Medical radiation exposure is a major concern, and several methods have been proposed to reduce radiation doses in multidetector cardiac computed tomography (CT).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to review radiation doses of clinical cardiac CT performed at our center and to evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction strategies on the median dose delivered to patients over time.
Methods: This study included 623 consecutive clinical patients (male, 58%) who were referred for imaging. The effective dose (mSv) was derived from the product of the dose-length-product (DLP) and a conversion coefficient for the chest (0.014).
Results: The median radiation dose of all patients was 3.0 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-8.1 mSv). A significant difference was observed in radiation dose between the prospective (n = 384) and retrospective (n = 239) gating groups (2.0 vs 9.6 mSv; P < 0.0001). Compared with patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 52), patients without CABG had significantly lower median radiation dose (prospective gating: 2.0 vs 3.4 mSv, P < 0.0001; retrospective gating: 9.3 vs 10.3 mSv, P < 0.0001). In patients with CABG, a significant difference was observed in radiation dose between prospective and retrospective gating (3.4 vs 10.3; P < 0.0001). The median radiation doses per month at our center decreased from 6.2 to 2.1 mSv over time with increasing use of prospective gating (≤91%).
Conclusion: Radiation reduction techniques have led to progressive decreases in radiation exposure over time, primarily because of prospective gating.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Trends in Cardiothoracic Imaging.
Capaccione K, Huang S, Leb J, Dsouza B, Goldstein J, Salvatore M Radiol Res Pract. 2022; 2022:7923228.
PMID: 35756751 PMC: 9225849. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7923228.
Patel A, Fine J, Naghavi M, Budoff M Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 35(1):179-183.
PMID: 30084106 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1431-0.
Van Cauteren T, Van Gompel G, Tanaka K, Verdries D, Belsack D, Nieboer K Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:2476171.
PMID: 28620616 PMC: 5460391. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2476171.
Abd Alamir M, Ellenberg S, Swerdloff R, Wenger N, Mohler 3rd E, Lewis C Coron Artery Dis. 2015; 27(2):95-103.
PMID: 26554661 PMC: 4738150. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000321.
Radiologic evaluation of coronary artery disease in adults with congenital heart disease.
Valenzuela D, Ordovas K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 32(1):13-8.
PMID: 26342712 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0760-5.