» Articles » PMID: 35754772

Feasibility of Markerless Motion Capture for Three-Dimensional Gait Assessment in Community Settings

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35754772
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis of gait holds potential as a digital biomarker to identify neuropathologies, monitor disease progression, and provide a high-resolution outcome measure to monitor neurorehabilitation efficacy by characterizing the mechanisms underlying gait impairments. There is a need for 3D motion capture technologies accessible to community, clinical, and rehabilitation settings. Image-based markerless motion capture (MLMC) using neural network-based deep learning algorithms shows promise as an accessible technology in these settings. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of implementing 3D MLMC technology outside the traditional laboratory environment to evaluate its potential as a tool for outcomes assessment in neurorehabilitation. A sample population of 166 individuals aged 9-87 years (mean 43.7, S.D. 20.4) of varied health history were evaluated at six different locations in the community over a 3-month period. Participants walked overground at self-selected (SS) and fastest comfortable (FC) speeds. Feasibility measures considered the expansion, implementation, and practicality of this MLMC system. A subset of the sample population (46 individuals) walked over a pressure-sensitive walkway (PSW) concurrently with MLMC to assess agreement of the spatiotemporal gait parameters measured between the two systems. Twelve spatiotemporal parameters were compared using mean differences, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement (ICC) and consistency (ICC). All measures showed good to excellent agreement between MLMC and the PSW system with cadence, speed, step length, step time, stride length, and stride time showing strong similarity. Furthermore, this information can inform the development of rehabilitation strategies targeting gait dysfunction. These first experiments provide evidence for feasibility of using MLMC in community and clinical practice environments to acquire robust 3D kinematic data from a diverse population. This foundational work enables future investigation with MLMC especially its use as a digital biomarker of disease progression and rehabilitation outcome.

Citing Articles

The inter-trial and inter-session reliability of Theia3D-derived markerless gait analysis in tight versus loose clothing.

Augustine S, Foster R, Barton G, Lake M, Sharir R, Robinson M PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18613.

PMID: 39763706 PMC: 11700486. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18613.


Advances in applying somatosensory interaction technology in geriatric care: A bibliometric analysis.

Pei C, Lyu W, Liu J, Wang Y, Ye W, Zhou Z Int J Nurs Sci. 2024; 11(5):571-577.

PMID: 39698138 PMC: 11650660. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.10.009.


Deep learning-based screening for locomotive syndrome using single-camera walking video: Development and validation study.

Kushioka J, Tada S, Takemura N, Fujimoto T, Nagahara H, Onoe M PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(11):e0000668.

PMID: 39591393 PMC: 11593753. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000668.


A comparison of lower body gait kinematics and kinetics between Theia3D markerless and marker-based models in healthy subjects and clinical patients.

DSouza S, Siebert T, Fohanno V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29154.

PMID: 39587194 PMC: 11589150. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80499-8.


Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences.

Winner T, Rosenberg M, Berman G, Kesar T, Ting L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19730.

PMID: 39183361 PMC: 11345452. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70787-8.


References
1.
Rapp E, Shin S, Thomsen W, Ferber R, Halilaj E . Estimation of kinematics from inertial measurement units using a combined deep learning and optimization framework. J Biomech. 2021; 116:110229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110229. View

2.
Bilney B, Morris M, Webster K . Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait. Gait Posture. 2003; 17(1):68-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00053-x. View

3.
Lonini L, Moon Y, Embry K, Cotton R, McKenzie K, Jenz S . Video-Based Pose Estimation for Gait Analysis in Stroke Survivors during Clinical Assessments: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Digit Biomark. 2022; 6(1):9-18. PMC: 8832219. DOI: 10.1159/000520732. View

4.
Hollman J, McDade E, Petersen R . Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. Gait Posture. 2011; 34(1):111-8. PMC: 3104090. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.024. View

5.
Wiedemeijer M, Otten E . Effects of high heeled shoes on gait. A review. Gait Posture. 2018; 61:423-430. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.036. View