» Articles » PMID: 35747995

Differential Bicistronic Gene Translation Mediated by the Internal Ribosome Entry Site Element of Encephalomyocarditis Virus

Overview
Journal Biomed J
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35747995
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) allow the translation of a transcript independent of its cap structure. They are distributed in some viruses and cellular RNA. The element is applied in dual gene expression in a single vector. Although it appears the lower efficiency of IRES-mediated translation than that of cap-dependent translation, it is with the crucial needs to know the precise differences in translational efficacy between upstream cistrons (cap-dependent) and downstream cistrons (IRES-mediate, cap-independent) before applying the bicistronic vector in biomedical applications.

Methods: This study aimed to provide real examples and showed the precise differences for translational efficiency dependent upon target gene locations. We generated various bicistronic constructs with quantifiable reporter genes as upstream and downstream cistrons of the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) IRES to precisely evaluate the efficacy of IRES-mediated translation in mammalian cells.

Results: There was no significant difference in protein production when the reporter gene was cloned as an upstream cistron. However, lower levels of protein production were obtained when the reporter gene was located downstream of the IRES. Moreover, in the presence of an upstream cistron, a markedly reduced level of protein production was observed.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the version of the EMCV IRES that is provided in many commercial vectors is relatively less efficient than cap-dependent translation and provide valuable information regarding the utilization of IRES to facilitate the expression of more than one protein from a transcript.

Citing Articles

Selectively expressed RNA molecules as a versatile tool for functionalized cell targeting.

Rastfeld F, Hoffmann M, Kruger S, Bohn P, Gribling-Burrer A, Wagner L Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):420.

PMID: 39762287 PMC: 11704337. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55547-6.


One day at a time.

Kattner A Biomed J. 2022; 44(6 Suppl 1):S1-S7.

PMID: 35042016 PMC: 8760849. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2022.01.009.

References
1.
Delluc-Clavieres A, Le Bec C, Van den Berghe L, Conte C, Allo V, Danos O . Efficient gene transfer in skeletal muscle with AAV-derived bicistronic vector using the FGF-1 IRES. Gene Ther. 2008; 15(15):1090-8. DOI: 10.1038/gt.2008.49. View

2.
Sugimoto Y, Aksentijevich I, Murray G, Brady R, Pastan I, Gottesman M . Retroviral coexpression of a multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) and human alpha-galactosidase A for gene therapy of Fabry disease. Hum Gene Ther. 1995; 6(7):905-15. DOI: 10.1089/hum.1995.6.7-905. View

3.
Pao W, Klimstra D, Fisher G, Varmus H . Use of avian retroviral vectors to introduce transcriptional regulators into mammalian cells for analyses of tumor maintenance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(15):8764-9. PMC: 166387. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1133333100. View

4.
Rees S, Coote J, Stables J, Goodson S, Harris S, Lee M . Bicistronic vector for the creation of stable mammalian cell lines that predisposes all antibiotic-resistant cells to express recombinant protein. Biotechniques. 1996; 20(1):102-4, 106, 108-10. DOI: 10.2144/96201st05. View

5.
Scheidemann F, Therrien J, Pfutzner W . Selectable bicistronic vectors in skin gene therapy. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008; 300(8):415-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-008-0878-6. View