A Systematic Review Evaluating Metacognitive Beliefs in Health Anxiety and Somatic Distress
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Increasing evidence suggests metacognitive beliefs may underpin transdiagnostic mechanisms maintaining psychopathology. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate published studies investigating the role of metacognitive beliefs in somatic distress in adult samples.
Method: A systematic review was conducted, spanning five data bases. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were qualitatively synthesized.
Results: Thirty-six studies (N = 12,390) met inclusion criteria with results suggesting a relatively consistent positive relationship between metacognitive beliefs and somatic distress. Both general and syndrome-specific metacognitive beliefs demonstrated relationships with not only emotional distress, but also physical symptoms themselves.
Conclusions: Results are discussed in terms of conceptualizing somatic distress through the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) Model. Future research into metacognitive therapy for somatic populations is recommended.
Rauwenhoff J, Hagen R, Karaliute M, Hjemdal O, Kennair L, Solem S Neurotrauma Rep. 2024; 5(1):890-902.
PMID: 39440149 PMC: 11491585. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2024.0076.
Iwama Y, Ikeda M Int J Med Educ. 2024; 15:99-109.
PMID: 39182222 PMC: 11687377. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.66af.82fc.
Worry Postponement From the Metacognitive Perspective: A Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial.
Krzikalla C, Buhlmann U, Schug J, Kopei I, Gerlach A, Doebler P Clin Psychol Eur. 2024; 6(2):e12741.
PMID: 39119056 PMC: 11303915. DOI: 10.32872/cpe.12741.
A systematic review evaluating metacognitive beliefs in health anxiety and somatic distress.
Keen E, Kangas M, Gilchrist P Br J Health Psychol. 2022; 27(4):1398-1422.
PMID: 35746856 PMC: 9796692. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12609.