A Wearable Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Reducing the Energy Cost of Human Movement

Overview

Journal Micromachines (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Date 2022 Jun 24

PMID 35744514

Authors

Xinyao Tang

Xupeng Wang

Xiaomin Ji

Yawen Zhou

Jie Yang

Yuchen Wei

Wenjie Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human body enhancement is an interesting branch of robotics. It focuses on wearable robots in order to improve the performance of human body, reduce energy consumption and delay fatigue, as well as increase body speed. Robot-assisted equipment, such as wearable exoskeletons, are wearable robot systems that integrate human intelligence and robot power. After careful design and adaptation, the human body has energy-saving sports, but it is an arduous task for the exoskeleton to achieve considerable reduction in metabolic rate. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the biomechanics of human sports, the body, and its weaknesses. In this study, a lower limb exoskeleton was classified according to the power source, and the working principle, design idea, wearing mode, material and performance of different types of lower limb exoskeletons were compared and analyzed. The study shows that the unpowered exoskeleton robot has inherent advantages in endurance, mass, volume, and cost, which is a new development direction of robot exoskeletons. This paper not only summarizes the existing research but also points out its shortcomings through the comparative analysis of different lower limb wearable exoskeletons. Furthermore, improvement measures suitable for practical application have been provided.

Citing Articles

Animals as Architects: Building the Future of Technology-Supported Rehabilitation with Biomimetic Principles.

Bonnechere B Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(12).

PMID: 39727727 PMC: 11673090. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9120723.

The Design and Application of an Assistive Hip Joint Exoskeleton for Tower Climbing.

Li M, Yin H, Yang Z, Hu H, Chen H, Fu Z Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686048 PMC: 11644631. DOI: 10.3390/s24237513.

An Unpowered Knee Exoskeleton for Walking Assistance and Energy Capture.

Tang X, Wang X, Xue Y, Wei P Micromachines (Basel). 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37893249 PMC: 10608919. DOI: 10.3390/mi14101812.

Metabolic cost of walking with electromechanical ankle exoskeletons under proportional myoelectric control on a treadmill and outdoors.

Hybart R, Villancio-Wolter K, Ferris D PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15775.

PMID: 37525661 PMC: 10387233. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15775.

Assessment of Exoskeletons on Nurses' Quality of Work Life: A Pilot Study at Foch Hospital.

Farah L, Roll D, Sorais A, Vallee A Nurs Rep. 2023; 13(2):780-791.

PMID: 37218949 PMC: 10204513. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep13020068.

References

Wiggin M, Sawicki G, Collins S . An exoskeleton using controlled energy storage and release to aid ankle propulsion. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2012; 2011:5975342. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975342. View

Mooney L, Rouse E, Herr H . Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:151. PMC: 4236484. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-151. View

van Dijk W, van der Kooij H, Hekman E . A passive exoskeleton with artificial tendons: design and experimental evaluation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2012; 2011:5975470. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975470. View

Panizzolo F, Galiana I, Asbeck A, Siviy C, Schmidt K, Holt K . A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016; 13(1):43. PMC: 4864923. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9. View

Baltrusch S, van Dieen J, Koopman A, Naf M, Rodriguez-Guerrero C, Babic J . SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 120(2):401-412. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04284-6. View

Lee G, Kim J, Panizzolo F, Zhou Y, Baker L, Galiana I . Reducing the metabolic cost of running with a tethered soft exosuit. Sci Robot. 2020; 2(6). DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan6708. View

Ling Z, Guo H, Boersma S . Analytical study on the kinematic and dynamic behaviors of a knee joint. Med Eng Phys. 1997; 19(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(96)00031-8. View

Shi Y, Guo M, Zhong H, Ji X, Xia D, Luo X . Kinetic Walking Energy Harvester Design for a Wearable Bowden Cable-Actuated Exoskeleton Robot. Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(4). PMC: 9024901. DOI: 10.3390/mi13040571. View

Malcolm P, Derave W, Galle S, Clercq D . A simple exoskeleton that assists plantarflexion can reduce the metabolic cost of human walking. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e56137. PMC: 3571952. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056137. View

10.

Galle S, Malcolm P, Collins S, Clercq D . Reducing the metabolic cost of walking with an ankle exoskeleton: interaction between actuation timing and power. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):35. PMC: 5408443. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0235-0. View

11.

Jamsek M, Petric T, Babic J . Gaussian Mixture Models for Control of Quasi-Passive Spinal Exoskeletons. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(9). PMC: 7248695. DOI: 10.3390/s20092705. View

12.

Peternel L, Noda T, Petric T, Ude A, Morimoto J, Babic J . Adaptive Control of Exoskeleton Robots for Periodic Assistive Behaviours Based on EMG Feedback Minimisation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0148942. PMC: 4755662. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148942. View

13.

Mooney L, Herr H . Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016; 13:4. PMC: 4730720. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0111-3. View

14.

Ferris D, Gordon K, Sawicki G, Peethambaran A . An improved powered ankle-foot orthosis using proportional myoelectric control. Gait Posture. 2005; 23(4):425-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.05.004. View

15.

Zhang C, Zhu Y, Fan J, Zhao J, Yu H . Design of a quasi-passive 3 DOFs ankle-foot wearable rehabilitation orthosis. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015; 26 Suppl 1:S647-54. DOI: 10.3233/BME-151356. View

16.

Wang X, Guo S, Qu H, Song M . Design of a Purely Mechanical Sensor-Controller Integrated System for Walking Assistance on an Ankle-Foot Exoskeleton. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(14). PMC: 6679259. DOI: 10.3390/s19143196. View

17.

Rashedi E, Kim S, Nussbaum M, Agnew M . Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work. Ergonomics. 2014; 57(12):1864-74. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.952682. View

18.

Guan X, Ji L, Wang R, Huang W . Optimization of an unpowered energy-stored exoskeleton for patients with spinal cord injury. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017; 2016:5030-5033. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591857. View

19.

Maurice P, camernik J, Gorjan D, Schirrmeister B, Bornmann J, Tagliapietra L . Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019; 28(1):152-164. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2945368. View

20.

Shamaei K, Cenciarini M, Adams A, Gregorczyk K, Schiffman J, Dollar A . Design and evaluation of a quasi-passive knee exoskeleton for investigation of motor adaptation in lower extremity joints. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014; 61(6):1809-21. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2307698. View