» Articles » PMID: 35736876

The Influence of Data-Driven Compressed Sensing Reconstruction on Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Breast DCE MRI

Overview
Journal Tomography
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 23
PMID 35736876
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radial acquisition with MOCCO reconstruction has been previously proposed for high spatial and temporal resolution breast DCE imaging. In this work, we characterize MOCCO across a wide range of temporal contrast enhancement in a digital reference object (DRO). Time-resolved radial data was simulated using a DRO with lesions in different PK parameters. The under sampled data were reconstructed at 5 s temporal resolution using the data-driven low-rank temporal model for MOCCO, compressed sensing with temporal total variation (CS-TV) and more conventional low-rank reconstruction (PCB). Our results demonstrated that MOCCO was able to recover curves with K values ranging from 0.01 to 0.8 min and fixed V = 0.3, where the fitted results are within a 10% bias error range. MOCCO reconstruction showed less impact on the selection of different temporal models than conventional low-rank reconstruction and the greater error was observed with PCB. CS-TV showed overall underestimation in both K and V. For the Monte-Carlo simulations, MOCCO was found to provide the most accurate reconstruction results for curves with intermediate lesion kinetics in the presence of noise. Initial in vivo experiences are reported in one patient volunteer. Overall, MOCCO was able to provide reconstructed time-series data that resulted in a more accurate measurement of PK parameters than PCB and CS-TV.

Citing Articles

Radiomics Integration of Mammography and DCE-MRI for Predicting Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Yang X, Li J, Sun H, Chen J, Xie J, Peng Y Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025; 17:187-200.

PMID: 39990966 PMC: 11846489. DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S488200.

References
1.
Heisen M, Fan X, Buurman J, Van Riel N, Karczmar G, Romeny B . The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2010; 63(3):811-6. PMC: 3076555. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22171. View

2.
Barboriak D, MacFall J, Viglianti B, Dewhirst Dvm M . Comparison of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of contrast agent distribution measured by dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 27(6):1388-98. PMC: 3755278. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21344. View

3.
Meissnitzer M, Dershaw D, Feigin K, Bernard-Davila B, Barra F, Morris E . MRI appearance of invasive subcentimetre breast carcinoma: benign characteristics are common. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90(1074):20170102. PMC: 5602188. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170102. View

4.
Gordon Y, Partovi S, Muller-Eschner M, Amarteifio E, Bauerle T, Weber M . Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: fundamentals and application to the evaluation of the peripheral perfusion. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014; 4(2):147-64. PMC: 3996240. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.03.01. View

5.
Tofts P . Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7(1):91-101. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070113. View