» Articles » PMID: 35731857

The Transposition Rate Has Little Influence on the Plateauing Level of the P-element

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 22
PMID 35731857
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The popular trap model assumes that the invasions of transposable elements (TEs) in mammals and invertebrates are stopped by piRNAs that emerge after insertion of the TE into a piRNA cluster. It remains, however, still unclear which factors influence the dynamics of TE invasions. The activity of the TE (i.e., transposition rate) is one frequently discussed key factor. Here we take advantage of the temperature-dependent activity of the P-element, a widely studied eukaryotic TE, to test how TE activity affects the dynamics of a TE invasion. We monitored P-element invasion dynamics in experimental Drosophila simulans populations at hot and cold culture conditions. Despite marked differences in transposition rates, the P-element reached very similar copy numbers at both temperatures. The reduction of the insertion rate upon approaching the copy number plateau was accompanied by similar amounts of piRNAs against the P-element at both temperatures. Nevertheless, we also observed fewer P-element insertions in piRNA clusters than expected, which is not compatible with a simple trap model. The ping-pong cycle, which degrades TE transcripts, becomes typically active after the copy number plateaued. We generated a model, with few parameters, that largely captures the observed invasion dynamics. We conclude that the transposition rate has at the most only a minor influence on TE abundance, but other factors, such as paramutations or selection against TE insertions are shaping the TE composition.

Citing Articles

On the origin of the P-element invasion in Drosophila simulans.

Wierzbicki F, Pianezza R, Selvaraju D, Eller M, Kofler R Mob DNA. 2025; 16(1):7.

PMID: 40011995 PMC: 11863927. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-025-00345-0.


The impact of insertion bias into piRNA clusters on the invasion of transposable elements.

Pritam S, Scarpa A, Kofler R, Signor S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464153 PMC: 11507707. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.06.616898.


Tolerance thresholds underlie responses to DNA damage during germline development.

Jansen G, Gebert D, Kumar T, Simmons E, Murphy S, Karam Teixeira F Genes Dev. 2024; 38(13-14):631-654.

PMID: 39054057 PMC: 11368186. DOI: 10.1101/gad.351701.124.


Spoink, a LTR retrotransposon, invaded D. melanogaster populations in the 1990s.

Pianezza R, Scarpa A, Narayanan P, Signor S, Kofler R PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(3):e1011201.

PMID: 38530818 PMC: 10965091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011201.


Experimentally evolving populations may fail to establish an effective piRNA-based host defense against invading -elements.

Selvaraju D, Wierzbicki F, Kofler R Genome Res. 2024; 34(3):410-425.

PMID: 38490738 PMC: 11067887. DOI: 10.1101/gr.278706.123.


References
1.
Mohn F, Sienski G, Handler D, Brennecke J . The rhino-deadlock-cutoff complex licenses noncanonical transcription of dual-strand piRNA clusters in Drosophila. Cell. 2014; 157(6):1364-1379. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.031. View

2.
Biemont C, Ronsseray S, Anxolabehere D, Izaabel H, Gautier C . Localization of P elements, copy number regulation, and cytotype determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1990; 56(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300028822. View

3.
Petrov D, Fiston-Lavier A, Lipatov M, Lenkov K, Gonzalez J . Population genomics of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 2010; 28(5):1633-44. PMC: 3080135. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq337. View

4.
Quesneville H, Bergman C, Andrieu O, Autard D, Nouaud D, Ashburner M . Combined evidence annotation of transposable elements in genome sequences. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005; 1(2):166-75. PMC: 1185648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010022. View

5.
Loreto E, Carareto C, Capy P . Revisiting horizontal transfer of transposable elements in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb). 2008; 100(6):545-54. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801094. View