» Articles » PMID: 35717594

Data-driven Approach for Automatic Detection of Aortic Valve Opening: B Point Detection from Impedance Cardiogram

Abstract

Pre-ejection period (PEP), an indicator of sympathetic nervous system activity, is useful in psychophysiology and cardiovascular studies. Accurate PEP measurement is challenging and relies on robust identification of the timing of aortic valve opening, marked as the B point on impedance cardiogram (ICG) signals. The ICG sensitivity to noise and its waveform's morphological variability makes automated B point detection difficult, requiring inefficient and cumbersome expert visual annotation. In this article, we propose a machine learning-based automated algorithm to detect the aortic valve opening for PEP measurement, which is robust against noise and ICG morphological variations. We analyzed over 60 hr of synchronized ECG and ICG records from 189 subjects. A total of 3657 averaged beats were formed using our recently developed ICG noise removal algorithm. Features such as the averaged ICG waveform, its first and second derivatives, as well as high-level morphological and critical hemodynamic parameters were extracted and fed into the regression algorithms to estimate the B point location. The morphological features were extracted from our proposed "variable" physiologically valid search-window related to diverse B point shapes. A subject-wise nested cross-validation procedure was performed for parameter tuning and model assessment. After examining multiple regression models, Adaboost was selected, which demonstrated superior performance and higher robustness to five state-of-the-art algorithms that were evaluated in terms of low mean absolute error of 3.5 ms, low median absolute error of 0.0 ms, high correlation with experts' estimates (Pearson coefficient = 0.9), and low standard deviation of errors of 9.2 ms. For reproducibility, an open-source toolbox is provided.

Citing Articles

Impedance cardiogram based exploration of cardiac mechanisms in post-traumatic stress disorder during trauma recall.

Sheikh S, Shah A, Douglas Bremner J, Vaccarino V, Inan O, Clifford G Psychophysiology. 2023; 61(4):e14488.

PMID: 37986190 PMC: 10939951. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14488.


An Effective Method of Detecting Characteristic Points of Impedance Cardiogram Verified in the Clinical Pilot Study.

Karpiel I, Richter-Laskowska M, Feige D, Gacek A, Sobotnicki A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).

PMID: 36560238 PMC: 9782651. DOI: 10.3390/s22249872.


Validation of a new impedance cardiography analysis algorithm for clinical classification of stress states.

Sheikh S, Gurel N, Gupta S, Chukwu I, Levantsevych O, Alkhalaf M Psychophysiology. 2022; 59(7):e14013.

PMID: 35150459 PMC: 9177512. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14013.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Ermishkin V, Kolesnikov V, Lukoshkova E . Age-dependent and 'pathologic' changes in ICG waveforms resulting from superposition of pre-ejection and ejection waves. Physiol Meas. 2014; 35(6):943-63. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/6/943. View

3.
Tronstad C, Hogetveit J, Elvebakk O, Kalvoy H . Age-related Differences in the Morphology of the Impedance Cardiography Signal. J Electr Bioimpedance. 2021; 10(1):139-145. PMC: 7851975. DOI: 10.2478/joeb-2019-0020. View

4.
Kelsey R, Ornduff S, Alpert B . Reliability of cardiovascular reactivity to stress: internal consistency. Psychophysiology. 2007; 44(2):216-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00499.x. View

5.
Silva Lopes B, Craveiro N, Firmino-Machado J, Ribeiro P, Castelo-Branco M . Hemodynamic differences among hypertensive patients with and without heart failure using impedance cardiography. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019; 13:1753944719876517. PMC: 6764032. DOI: 10.1177/1753944719876517. View