» Articles » PMID: 35703052

Mechanical Compensation in the Evolution of the Early Hominin Feeding Apparatus

Abstract

Australopiths, a group of hominins from the Plio-Pleistocene of Africa, are characterized by derived traits in their crania hypothesized to strengthen the facial skeleton against feeding loads and increase the efficiency of bite force production. The crania of robust australopiths are further thought to be stronger and more efficient than those of gracile australopiths. Results of prior mechanical analyses have been broadly consistent with this hypothesis, but here we show that the predictions of the hypothesis with respect to mechanical strength are not met: some gracile australopith crania are as strong as that of a robust australopith, and the strength of gracile australopith crania overlaps substantially with that of chimpanzee crania. We hypothesize that the evolution of cranial traits that increased the efficiency of bite force production in australopiths may have simultaneously weakened the face, leading to the compensatory evolution of additional traits that reinforced the facial skeleton. The evolution of facial form in early hominins can therefore be thought of as an interplay between the need to increase the efficiency of bite force production and the need to maintain the structural integrity of the face.

Citing Articles

Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.

Ledogar J, Senck S, Villmoare B, Smith A, Weber G, Richmond B Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20220711.

PMID: 35703052 PMC: 9198777. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0711.

References
1.
Strait D, Grine F . Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa. J Hum Evol. 2004; 47(6):399-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.008. View

2.
Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Neubauer S, Weber G, Bookstein F . Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. J Hum Evol. 2009; 57(1):48-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.004. View

3.
Xia J, Zheng J, Huang D, Tian Z, Chen L, Zhou Z . New model to explain tooth wear with implications for microwear formation and diet reconstruction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(34):10669-72. PMC: 4553824. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1509491112. View

4.
Ledogar J, Smith A, Benazzi S, Weber G, Spencer M, Carlson K . Mechanical evidence that Australopithecus sediba was limited in its ability to eat hard foods. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10596. PMC: 4748115. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10596. View

5.
Merceron G, Ramdarshan A, Blondel C, Boisserie J, Brunetiere N, Francisco A . Untangling the environmental from the dietary: dust does not matter. Proc Biol Sci. 2016; 283(1838). PMC: 5031653. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1032. View