» Articles » PMID: 35697913

Audience Effect on Domestic Dogs' Behavioural Displays and Facial Expressions

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jun 13
PMID 35697913
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present study we investigated the influence of positive and negative arousal situations and the presence of an audience on dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions. We exposed dogs to positive anticipation, non-social frustration and social frustration evoking test sessions and measured pre and post-test salivary cortisol concentrations. Cortisol concentration did not increase during the tests and there was no difference in pre or post-test concentrations in the different test conditions, excluding a different level of arousal. Displacement behaviours of "looking away" and "sniffing the environment" occurred more in the frustration-evoking situations compared to the positive anticipation and were correlated with cortisol concentrations. "Ears forward" occurred more in the positive anticipation condition compared to the frustration-evoking conditions, was positively influenced by the presence of an audience, and negatively correlated to the pre-test cortisol concentrations, suggesting it may be a good indicator of dogs' level of attention. "Ears flattener", "blink", "nose lick", "tail wagging" and "whining" were associated with the presence of an audience but were not correlated to cortisol concentrations, suggesting a communicative component of these visual displays. These findings are a first step to systematically test which subtle cues could be considered communicative signals in domestic dogs.

Citing Articles

If you blink at me, I'll blink back. Domestic dogs' feedback to conspecific visual cues.

Canori C, Travain T, Pedretti G, Fontani R, Valsecchi P R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(2):241703.

PMID: 39975663 PMC: 11836432. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241703.


Intra and interspecific audience effect on domestic dogs' behavioural displays and facial expressions.

Pedretti G, Canori C, Costantini E, Palme R, Valsecchi P, Marshall-Pescini S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9546.

PMID: 38664496 PMC: 11045831. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58757-6.


What if the reward is not as yummy? Study of the effects of Successive Negative Contrast in domestic dogs in two different tasks.

Dzik M, Carballo F, Cavalli C, Iglesias M, Farago T, Kubinyi E J Vet Behav. 2024; 72:18-27.

PMID: 38435337 PMC: 7615697. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2023.12.009.


Why do dogs wag their tails?.

Leonetti S, Cimarelli G, Hersh T, Ravignani A Biol Lett. 2024; 20(1):20230407.

PMID: 38229554 PMC: 10792393. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0407.


Pain: Behavioural expression and response in an evolutionary framework.

de C Williams A Evol Med Public Health. 2023; 11(1):429-437.

PMID: 38022798 PMC: 10656790. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoad038.


References
1.
Srithunyarat T, Hagman R, Hoglund O, Stridsberg M, Hanson J, Lagerstedt A . Catestatin, vasostatin, cortisol, and visual analog scale scoring for stress assessment in healthy dogs. Res Vet Sci. 2017; 117:74-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.11.015. View

2.
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H . Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011; 65(1):47-55. PMC: 3015194. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5. View

3.
Hostetter A, Cantero M, Hopkins W . Differential use of vocal and gestural communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in response to the attentional status of a human (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol. 2002; 115(4):337-43. PMC: 2080764. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7036.115.4.337. View

4.
Waller B, Peirce K, Caeiro C, Scheider L, Burrows A, McCune S . Paedomorphic facial expressions give dogs a selective advantage. PLoS One. 2014; 8(12):e82686. PMC: 3873274. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082686. View

5.
Gahwiler S, Bremhorst A, Toth K, Riemer S . Fear expressions of dogs during New Year fireworks: a video analysis. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16035. PMC: 7525486. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72841-7. View